Shrinking Salamanders: Global Warming to Blame?
According to new research, salamanders may be shrinking in size due to the environmental changes caused by rapid climate change.
Wild salamanders living in some of North America’s best salamander habitats are getting smaller as their surroundings get warmer and drier, forcing them to burn more energy in a changing climate.
According to a new study that examined museum specimens caught in the Appalachian Mountains from 1957 to 2007 and wild salamanders measured at the same sites in 2011-2012, salamanders studied from 1980 onward were, on average, 8 percent smaller than their counterparts from earlier decades. The changes were most marked in the Southern Appalachians and at low elevations––settings where detailed weather records showed the climate has warmed and dried out most.
“This is one of the largest and fastest rates of change ever recorded in any animal,” said Karen R. Lips, an associate professor of biology at the University of Maryland and the study’s senior author. “We don’t know exactly how or why it’s happening, but our data show it is clearly correlated with climate change.”
The study was prompted by the work of University of Maryland Prof. Emeritus Richard Highton, who began collecting salamanders in the Appalachian Mountains in 1957. The geologically ancient mountain range’s moist forests and long evolutionary history make it a global hot spot for a variety of salamander species. Highton collected hundreds of thousands of salamanders, now preserved in jars at the Smithsonian Institution’s Museum Service Center in Suitland, MD.
Between summer 2011 and spring 2012, Lips and her students caught, measured and took DNA samples from wild salamanders at 78 of Highton’s collecting sites in Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee, and North Carolina. Using relatively new techniques for analyzing DNA from preserved specimens, the researchers tested some of Highton’s salamanders for disease.
Lips found virtually no fungal disease in the museum specimens or the living animals. But when she compared size measurements of the older specimens with today’s wild salamanders, the differences were striking.
Between 1957 and 2012, six salamander species got significantly smaller, while only one got slightly larger. On average, each generation was one percent smaller than its parents’ generation.
The researchers compared changes in body size to the animals’ location and their sites’ elevation, temperature and rainfall. They found the salamanders shrank the most at southerly sites, where temperatures rose and rainfall decreased over the 55-year study.
To find out how climate change affected the animals, Clemson University biologist Michael W. Sears used a computer program to create an artificial salamander, which allowed him to estimate a typical salamander’s daily activity and the number of calories it burned. Using detailed weather records for the study sites, Sears was able to simulate the minute-by-minute behavior of individual salamanders, based on weather conditions at their home sites during their lifetimes.
The simulation showed the modern salamanders were just as active as their forbears had been. But to maintain that activity, they had to burn 7 to 8 percent more energy. Cold-blooded animals’ metabolisms speed up as temperatures rise, Sears explained.
To get that extra energy, salamanders must make trade-offs, Lips said. They may spend more time foraging for food or resting in cool ponds, and less time hunting for mates. The smaller animals may have fewer young, and may be more easily picked off by predators.
The research team’s next step will be to compare the salamander species that are getting smaller to the ones that are disappearing from parts of their range. If they match, the team will be one step closer to understanding why salamanders are declining in a part of the world that once was a haven for them.