EDF: Voluntary Reporting Fails to Deliver Safety Data

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has acknowledged that its voluntary approach to reporting has yielded only limited information on a small fraction of the hundreds of potentially toxic nanomaterials already in commercial use or in development in the United States, according to a Jan. 13 Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) press release.

In an interim report issued nearly a year after launch of its Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program, EPA disclosed that it has received submissions addressing less than 10 percent of the more than 1,000 nanomaterials the agency identified as likely to be in commercial production. Moreover, the voluntary submissions contain scant environmental health and safety data, and much of the information they do contain is kept secret from the public because the companies submitting the data claim it is confidential business information (CBI).

While still claiming the Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program to be "successful," EPA's report concedes that the program has come nowhere close to assembling a full picture of research and commercial activity involving nanomaterials. The report's other findings include:

•  The submissions encompassed only 1/7 of the unique chemical structures on which nanomaterials in u or development are based.

•  Toxicity and environmental fate data were provided for at most a few percent of these nanomaterials, confirming that only a small fraction of all nanomaterials have been sufficiently studied despite their rapid commercialization.

EPA acknowledged it cannot determine whether participants submitted information on all or only a subset of nanomaterials they produce and whether information submitted for a given nanomaterial was complete or selective.

Only four companies have agreed to consider conducting any testing, leading EPA to conclude that "most companies are not inclined to voluntarily test their nanoscale materials."

comments powered by Disqus