EPA Publishes TSCA Formulation Documents, Asbestos Rule

"These actions provide the American people with transparency and an opportunity to comment on how EPA plans to evaluate the ten chemicals undergoing risk evaluation, select studies, and use the best available science to ensure chemicals in the marketplace are safe," EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt said. "At the same time, we are moving forward to take important, unprecedented action on asbestos."

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on June 1 released the first 10 chemicals' problem formulation documents, EPA's systemic review approach document, and a significant new use rule (SNUR) proposal enabling the agency to prevent new uses of asbestos, all for public comment. The latter is the first such action on asbestos ever proposed, according to EPA.

The SNUR, for certain uses of asbestos (including asbestos-containing goods), would require manufacturers and importers to receive EPA approval before starting or resuming manufacturing, and importing or processing of asbestos. This review process would give EPA the opportunity to evaluate the intended use of asbestos and, when necessary, take action to prohibit or limit the use.

"These actions provide the American people with transparency and an opportunity to comment on how EPA plans to evaluate the ten chemicals undergoing risk evaluation, select studies, and use the best available science to ensure chemicals in the marketplace are safe," EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt said. "At the same time, we are moving forward to take important, unprecedented action on asbestos."

The problem formulation documents refine the scope of risk evaluations for the first 10 chemicals selected under the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, which amended the Toxic Substances Control Act; the documents "are an important interim step prior to completing and publishing the final risk evaluations by December 2019. They clarify the chemical uses that EPA expects to evaluate and describe how EPA expects to conduct the evaluations," according to the agency's news release. Comments are due in 45 days, once the documents are published in the Federal Register (Docket: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0210).

Comments on the asbestos SNUR are due in 60 days upon publication (Docket: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0159).

Comments may be submitted to each of the chemicals’ respective dockets:

  • Asbestos: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0736
  • 1-Bromopropane: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0741
  • Carbon Tetrachloride: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0733
  • 1,4-Dioxane: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0723
  • Cyclic Aliphatic Bromide Cluster (HBCD): EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0735
  • Methylene Chloride: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0742
  • N-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP): EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0743
  • Pigment Violet 29 (Anthra[2,1,9-def:6,5,10-d’e’f’]diisoquinoline-1,3,8,10(2H,9H)-tetrone): EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0725
  • Trichloroethylene (TCE): EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0737
  • Perchloroethylene: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0732

The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act required EPA to select the first 10 chemicals to undergo risk evaluations; the chemicals were announced on Dec. 16, 2016. As required, EPA issued corresponding scope documents on June 22, 2017, for these chemicals, which describe the scope of the risk evaluation to be conducted, including the hazards, exposures, conditions of use, and potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations that the Agency expects to consider. The problem formulation documents EPA issued June 1 refine those scope documents.

Download Center

  • Your Guide to Environmental Metrics that Drive Performance

    Translating sustainability into action starts with implementing the right metrics to assess your environmental risk and performance. Learn how to design metrics that improve your decision-making process and drive enterprise performance.

  • Unpacking ESG: 6 Questions You Were Too Afraid to Ask

    Environmental and Sustainability experts from Arcadis and Cority answer 6 of the most pressing questions EHS professionals have about getting started with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting.

  • 5 Keys to Best-in-Class Chemical Management

    Running a safe chemical program is challenging and complex: from knowing what's on-site to proper handling and disposal - all while navigating regulatory changes. Learn the best ways to mitigate chemical risk, get the most value out of your data, and gain buy-in for a chemical management solution.

  • Streamline Your Air Emissions Management

    See how consolidating all your emissions management functions into one centralized system can help you streamline your operations, more easily maintain compliance, and achieve greater time and cost savings.

  • A Crash Course in Creating the Right Environmental Scoring System

    Learn how to develop the right environmental scoring system so you can easily benchmark performance across all your facilities and gain a holistic view of your environmental programs.

  • Industry Safe