GAO Recommends Eliminating Coal Mine Operators' Self-Bonding

GAO found that state agencies and OSMRE report they hold approximately $10.2 billion in surety bonds, collateral bonds, and self-bonds as financial assurances for coal mine reclamation. The stakeholders GAO interviewed identified several challenges OSMRE and state agencies face in managing financial assurances, citing industry bankruptcies and lower coal demand.

A new report from GAO, the Government Accountability Office, recommends that the Department of the Interior's Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) stop allowing coal mine operators to use self-bonding -- the practice of guaranteeing on the basis of their own finances to cover the costs of restoring land they have disturbed, after mining has finished. The federal government requires coal companies to get bonds to assure their payment for these activities, and federal law permits mine operators in some cases to self-bond rather than secure a bond through another company or providing collateral.

"Some stakeholders told us that self-bonds are riskier now than before, citing industry bankruptcies and lower coal demand," according to GAO, which recommends in the report that Congress consider amending the law to eliminate self-bonding.

GAO found that state agencies and OSMRE report they hold approximately $10.2 billion in surety bonds (guaranteed by a third party), collateral bonds (guaranteed by a tangible asset, such as a certificate of deposit), and self-bonds (guaranteed on the basis of a coal operator's own finances) as financial assurances for coal mine reclamation. The stakeholders GAO interviewed identified several challenges OSMRE and state agencies face in managing financial assurances, including:

  • Obtaining additional financial assurances from operators for unanticipated reclamation costs, such as long-term treatment for water pollution, can be difficult.
  • Determining the financial stability of surety companies has been challenging in certain instances.
  • Self-bonding presents a risk to the government because it is difficult to 1) ascertain the financial health of an operator, 2) determine whether the operator qualifies for self-bonding, and 3) obtain a replacement for existing self-bonds when an operator no longer qualifies.
  • Some stakeholders said the risk from self-bonding is greater now than when the practice was first authorized under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act.

GAO previously reviewed federal financial assurance requirements for various energy and mineral extraction sectors and found coal mining is the only one where self-bonding was allowed. Because the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act allows states to decide whether to accept self-bonds, eliminating the risk that self-bonds pose to the federal government and states would require that law to be amended.

GAO said the Interior Department "neither agreed nor disagreed with GAO's recommendation."

Download Center

  • Monitoring and Reporting on Air Emissions for Regulators and the Real World

    When it comes to managing compliance and regulatory issues surrounding air emissions, there are no easy jobs. With interviews from practitioners from American Electric Power, Red Cedar Gathering, Trinity Consultants, and Cority, this eBook provides practical advice to advance your air emissions monitoring and reporting programs.

  • What Every EHS Professional Should Know About ESG

    Join experts from Arcadis and Cority on April 27th to learn the most common ESG reporting frameworks and how technology can help you improve reporting efficiency, identify areas for improvement, and create defensible audit trails.

  • Green Quadrant EHS Software 2021

    Read the new report by independent analyst firm, Verdantix, to get an unbiased comparison of the 22 most prominent EHS software vendors in the industry.

  • RFP Template for Waste Management Software

    Learn the essential questions to ask when evaluating waste management software solutions with this free, ready-to-use RFP template

  • 5 Keys to Best-in-Class Chemical Management

    Running a safe chemical program is challenging and complex: from knowing what's on-site to proper handling and disposal - all while navigating regulatory changes. Learn the best ways to mitigate chemical risk, get the most value out of your data, and gain buy-in for a chemical management solution.

Featured Webinar