The 2008 spill of 5.4 million cubic yards of fly ash, a byproduct of the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston Fossil coal-fired electricity generating plant, destroyed homes and filled streams and valleys.

Proving Damages for 2008 Coal Ash Spill a Steep Obstacle

After Tennessee Valley Authority was found liable for a massive coal ash spill, landowners this year will have to hire their own attorneys to press their individual claims. The larger question is whether facilities like the Kingston plant, with their inherent dangers to climate, waterways, and communities, are part of our continuing energy future.

In Roane County, Tennessee, days before Christmas 2008, a wave of wet coal ash barreled down the Clinch and Emory rivers, wiping out homes and choking rivers, streams, and valleys. The source: 5.4 million cubic yards of fly ash, a byproduct of the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) Kingston Fossil coal-fired electricity generating plant, let go when earthen walls, dams, and dikes collapsed. More than 300 acres downstream of the plant were submerged in coal ash and rainwater containing high concentrations of heavy metals and toxic chemicals.

In August 2012, the U.S. Federal Court in the Eastern District of Tennessee held that downstream landowners can recover damages from TVA for what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency described as "one of the worst environmental disasters of its kind in history." All along, TVA argued that an unprecedented combination of frigid temperatures and increased rainfall caused holding dikes to shift and break, releasing 70 years of fly-ash sludge, but Judge Thomas Varlan found otherwise, carefully piecing through more than 70 years of poor construction, failed inspections, skipped mandatory improvements, and overall careless management that caused the dam’s demise multiple times in the past decade, resulting in the final, catastrophic spill.

Yet while finding TVA's negligent maintenance of the holding ponds responsible for the spill and damage, Varlan limited the claims and put the responsibility on the individual landowners to prove actual damages. Landowners are expected to bring claims under this ruling within the new few months, but it won't be easy: Individual landowners — 800 at last count — will have to hire their own attorneys to press their individual claims. In a county where the average household income is just $41,000, access to skilled legal staff prepared to help landowners exercise their rights may be limited. Traditional mechanisms that might give landowners easy access to relief, including class-action status, were dismissed by the court early in proceedings, along with the opportunities for either a jury trial or consideration of punitive damages.

Cleanup Far from Finished
While TVA and federal authorities work to clean up damage from the spill, for some communities that process is slow. In May 2009, TVA reached an agreement with EPA to clean up and restore all affected areas from the spill, and TVA paid $43 million to the Roane County Economic Development Foundation toward restoration efforts in the region. Government estimates put the cost of total cleanup at about $1.2 billion. More than four years later, sludge remains 6 feet deep atop residential properties in some communities.

While the 800 affected households seek compensation for damages, the 9 million power customers served by the Kingston plant still receive the coal plant's electricity. The obvious point — that dangerous facilities should be rigorously and responsibly maintained — is undisputed and confirmed by Judge Varlan's thoughtful and precise decision. The larger question is whether such facilities, with their inherent dangers to climate, waterways, and communities, belong as part of our continuing energy future.

Download Center

  • Your Guide to Environmental Metrics that Drive Performance

    Translating sustainability into action starts with implementing the right metrics to assess your environmental risk and performance. Learn how to design metrics that improve your decision-making process and drive enterprise performance.

  • Unpacking ESG: 6 Questions You Were Too Afraid to Ask

    Environmental and Sustainability experts from Arcadis and Cority answer 6 of the most pressing questions EHS professionals have about getting started with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting.

  • 5 Keys to Best-in-Class Chemical Management

    Running a safe chemical program is challenging and complex: from knowing what's on-site to proper handling and disposal - all while navigating regulatory changes. Learn the best ways to mitigate chemical risk, get the most value out of your data, and gain buy-in for a chemical management solution.

  • Streamline Your Air Emissions Management

    See how consolidating all your emissions management functions into one centralized system can help you streamline your operations, more easily maintain compliance, and achieve greater time and cost savings.

  • A Crash Course in Creating the Right Environmental Scoring System

    Learn how to develop the right environmental scoring system so you can easily benchmark performance across all your facilities and gain a holistic view of your environmental programs.

  • Industry Safe