Oxford University Study Suggest Productive Farms Can Be Greener Than Organic

Farms that aim for high food production using environmentally friendly practices could be better for the environment than both organic and conventional farms.

A study, led by Oxford University scientists, compared the environmental impact of different farming systems.
The researchers found that integrated farms that maximized crop yields while using environmentally friendly techniques – such as crop rotation, organic fertilizers, over winter cover crops, and minimal use of pesticides – would use less energy and generate lower greenhouse gas emissions per unit of production than both organic and conventional farms.
A report of the research is published in the journal Agricultural Systems.
"Farming in a way that’s good for the environment doesn’t have to mean accepting a dramatic drop in food production," said Dr. Hanna Tuomisto, who led the research at Oxford University’s Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU). "Our research suggests that integrated farming systems, which combine the best practices for producing high yields with low negative environmental impacts, can be more beneficial for the environment than either organic or conventional farming."
"Integrating the needs of food production and wildlife conservation is a major 21st Century challenge – humanity needs both, and it’s only by taking account of all the costs and benefits that the best compromises can be found," said Professor David Macdonald of Oxford University’s WildCRU, who directed the research.
The research also found that possible alternative land uses should be factored in to any assessment of different farming systems.
"If you grow food organically you have to use much more land to grow the same amount of food than you would using other methods, meaning this land cannot be used for something else," said Dr. Tuomisto. "Once we factored in the potential alternative land uses, both integrated and conventional farming systems, which produce high volumes of food per acre, began to look much more attractive in terms of overall energy use, emissions, and the impact on biodiversity."
The study considered three different alternative uses for land not used in food production; energy crop production (growing Miscanthus), managed forest, and natural forest. The researchers assumed that biomass from either Miscanthus or managed woodland would be burnt to generate heat.


Download Center

  • Monitoring and Reporting on Air Emissions for Regulators and the Real World

    When it comes to managing compliance and regulatory issues surrounding air emissions, there are no easy jobs. With interviews from practitioners from American Electric Power, Red Cedar Gathering, Trinity Consultants, and Cority, this eBook provides practical advice to advance your air emissions monitoring and reporting programs.

  • What Every EHS Professional Should Know About ESG

    Join experts from Arcadis and Cority on April 27th to learn the most common ESG reporting frameworks and how technology can help you improve reporting efficiency, identify areas for improvement, and create defensible audit trails.

  • Green Quadrant EHS Software 2021

    Read the new report by independent analyst firm, Verdantix, to get an unbiased comparison of the 22 most prominent EHS software vendors in the industry.

  • RFP Template for Waste Management Software

    Learn the essential questions to ask when evaluating waste management software solutions with this free, ready-to-use RFP template

  • 5 Keys to Best-in-Class Chemical Management

    Running a safe chemical program is challenging and complex: from knowing what's on-site to proper handling and disposal - all while navigating regulatory changes. Learn the best ways to mitigate chemical risk, get the most value out of your data, and gain buy-in for a chemical management solution.

Featured Webinar