Intact wetlands along coastal Louisiana.

New Orleans' Corps of Engineers to Use Modified Charleston Method

The mitigation assessment tool should improve process consistency when the Corps is determining the environmental impact of a particular project.

To improve consistency when determining a project’s environmental impact and required wetland mitigation, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New Orleans District’s Regulatory Branch will begin using the Modified Charleston Method (MCM) in its permit application evaluation process.

“The Modified Charleston Method will assist our project managers in assuring that unavoidable impacts to wetland functions are fully compensated by an applicant’s mitigation plan,” stated Pete Serio, chief of the New Orleans District’s Regulatory Branch. “Additionally, this method will not only promote consistency between our project managers but between all of the Corps districts that operate within Louisiana.”

The Charleston Method is a mitigation assessment tool developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District in 2002 and has been adopted by numerous districts throughout the Corps. For each permit application, the project manager evaluates a suite of factors, selecting the option that best describes site conditions for each. These responses are then quantified using pre-established values to determine the project’s overall impact and required mitigation.

The New Orleans District worked closely with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services, National Marine Fisheries Service, the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries and other Corps districts to modify the existing criteria priorities to better reflect wetland conditions found in South Louisiana.

In addition to increased consistency, other advantages associated with the MCM include providing a quick assessment of impacts and mitigation requirements while requiring minimal field data collection, simplifies mixing of appropriate mitigation location and types, and provides a reliable tool for use by developers and planners to compare mitigation options.

Download Center

  • Monitoring and Reporting on Air Emissions for Regulators and the Real World

    When it comes to managing compliance and regulatory issues surrounding air emissions, there are no easy jobs. With interviews from practitioners from American Electric Power, Red Cedar Gathering, Trinity Consultants, and Cority, this eBook provides practical advice to advance your air emissions monitoring and reporting programs.

  • What Every EHS Professional Should Know About ESG

    Join experts from Arcadis and Cority on April 27th to learn the most common ESG reporting frameworks and how technology can help you improve reporting efficiency, identify areas for improvement, and create defensible audit trails.

  • Green Quadrant EHS Software 2021

    Read the new report by independent analyst firm, Verdantix, to get an unbiased comparison of the 22 most prominent EHS software vendors in the industry.

  • RFP Template for Waste Management Software

    Learn the essential questions to ask when evaluating waste management software solutions with this free, ready-to-use RFP template

  • 5 Keys to Best-in-Class Chemical Management

    Running a safe chemical program is challenging and complex: from knowing what's on-site to proper handling and disposal - all while navigating regulatory changes. Learn the best ways to mitigate chemical risk, get the most value out of your data, and gain buy-in for a chemical management solution.

Featured Webinar