Report: Washington Farmers May Profit from CO2 Capture

Washington’s farmers could play a positive and potentially profitable role in combating climate change, according to a report by a panel of agricultural producers, economists, and scientists.

The Agriculture Sector Carbon Market Workgroup determined that Washington agricultural producers could sequester or capture as much as 7 million metric tons of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. The report suggests that Washington’s farmers and ranchers could profit from selling carbon credits under a free-market system to reduce the emissions that cause climate change.

“Today’s farming practices represent both a source of greenhouse gas emissions and a strategy to capture them,” said Chad Kruger of Washington State University, a co-chair of the workgroup. “Because farms are businesses that operate on narrow margins, producers need to recover the costs of implementing practices that mitigate climate change. We’ve identified some key farming practices that will further reduce emissions, capture additional gases, and help farmers sell to other greenhouse gas emitters in the carbon credit markets.”

Current agricultural practices in Washington are estimated to capture more carbon than is released during farming. Several practical strategies highlighted in the report would further reduce emissions and capture more greenhouse gases, including:

• Reducing nitrogen fertilizer use, making fewer passes in the field and implementing precision farming practices;

• Expanding the use of farmland conservation programs that sequester carbon by allowing producers to earn carbon emission credits on enrolled lands; and

• Capturing more methane from manure in anaerobic digesters that create energy.

“Climate change offers a real opportunity for our producers,” said Kirk Cook, a hydrogeologist with the Washington State Department of Agriculture and workgroup co-chair. “While changing climate and rainfall patterns are a real threat to production agriculture, the strategies we identified will increase the competitiveness of Washington’s farmers. None of the strategies we point to would put Washington’s producers at a disadvantage.”

The workgroup also provided guidance on how to improve the accuracy of estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from farming, as well as the amount of gases captured in agricultural sequestration projects. A reliable baseline of carbon emissions by the state’s farmers, including data that reflects the diversity of crops in Washington, has yet to be established.

The full report is available at

Download Center

  • Waste Management in 2021: Accelerate Your Success with Technology

    Join waste management experts on February 23rd for a live best practice session webinar. You’ll learn how to take your waste program to the next level with visual location, barcoding, and mobility. Register now.

  • Green Quadrant EHS Software 2021

    Reserve your copy of the new report by independent analyst firm, Verdantix, to get a detailed, fact-based comparison of the 22 most prominent EHS software vendors in the industry.

  • Your Guide to Environmental Metrics that Drive Performance

    Translating sustainability into action starts with implementing the right metrics to assess your environmental risk and performance. Learn how to design metrics that improve your decision-making process and drive enterprise performance.

  • 5 Keys to Best-in-Class Chemical Management

    Running a safe chemical program is challenging and complex: from knowing what's on-site to proper handling and disposal - all while navigating regulatory changes. Learn the best ways to mitigate chemical risk, get the most value out of your data, and gain buy-in for a chemical management solution.

  • Unpacking ESG: 6 Questions You Were Too Afraid to Ask

    Environmental and Sustainability experts from Arcadis and Cority answer 6 of the most pressing questions EHS professionals have about getting started with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting.

  • Industry Safe