Waste Associations Want Performance-Based End to Post-Closure Care

"We believe that a one-size-fits-all approach to post-closure care is too prescriptive and does not account for the differences among landfills," said Darrell Smith, NWRA's president and CEO. "A performance-based standard offers wider applicability to achieve the same environmental protection goals."

The Solid Waste Association of North America (SWANA) and the National Waste and Recycling Association (NWRA) are jointly recommending a major shift in the process states use to determine when closed municipal solid waste landfills are ready to end post-closure care. They jointly called for the length of required post-closure care to be determined on a site-specific basis, rather than set by regulation at a single pre-determined number of years for all closed MSW landfills in all 50 states.

"NWRA and SWANA worked hard to develop this document together. We believe that a one-size-fits-all approach to post-closure care is too prescriptive and does not account for the differences among landfills," said Darrell Smith, NWRA's president and CEO. "A performance-based standard offers wider applicability to achieve the same environmental protection goals."

RCRA Federal Subtitle D established a post-closure care period of 30 years but allowed states to adjust the actual length of time up or down as they thought necessary to protect human health and the environment. The federal standard did not specify the data or methodology required to be used. EPA addressed a similar lack of specificity regarding post-closure care for hazardous waste landfills in 2016.

Public and private landfill operators want to close facilities and complete post-closure care in ways that protect human health and the environment. In practice, many state regulations don't establish what needs to be measured and what measurement results will demonstrate the required level of protection for a closed landfill. This leads to a uncertainty about when post-closure care requirements can be terminated and what is considered a stable condition.

"We want to encourage our association members to work with the state regulatory agencies to establish regional performance-based evaluation processes," said Jeffrey S. Murray, SWANA International Board past president. "Holding owners and operators to the same science-based standard of performance will instill more confidence in how potential risks have been mitigated through facility closure and lead to smoother transitions to custodial or long-term management and potential reuse."

The NWRA and SWANA documents include examples of multiple state PCC period termination programs, all of which include recognition that landfills should demonstrate stability in four areas: groundwater monitoring, landfill gas, leachate, and stability and cover integrity. SWANA's technical policy and NWRA's position statement are very similar and reflect the collaboration between the members of the two associations on this topic. Both clearly emphasize the need for supporting data and protection of human health and the environment through the process of evaluating a landfill's stability and readiness for the termination of post-closure care.

Download Center

  • Your Guide to Environmental Metrics that Drive Performance

    Translating sustainability into action starts with implementing the right metrics to assess your environmental risk and performance. Learn how to design metrics that improve your decision-making process and drive enterprise performance.

  • Unpacking ESG: 6 Questions You Were Too Afraid to Ask

    Environmental and Sustainability experts from Arcadis and Cority answer 6 of the most pressing questions EHS professionals have about getting started with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting.

  • 5 Keys to Best-in-Class Chemical Management

    Running a safe chemical program is challenging and complex: from knowing what's on-site to proper handling and disposal - all while navigating regulatory changes. Learn the best ways to mitigate chemical risk, get the most value out of your data, and gain buy-in for a chemical management solution.

  • Streamline Your Air Emissions Management

    See how consolidating all your emissions management functions into one centralized system can help you streamline your operations, more easily maintain compliance, and achieve greater time and cost savings.

  • A Crash Course in Creating the Right Environmental Scoring System

    Learn how to develop the right environmental scoring system so you can easily benchmark performance across all your facilities and gain a holistic view of your environmental programs.

  • Industry Safe