Environmental Protection Blog

Blog archive

Air Pollution Control Technology or EPA Fines? You Decide.

One company's audacious defiance of EPA regulations has ended up costing them dearly. SA Recycling LLC of Anaheim, Calif., has agreed to settle a lawsuit from Los Angeles County for failure to install and operate a dust collection systems at its various facilities. The company has agreed to a $2.9 million settlement and to pay an additional $690,000 in fines and investigative expenses.

The lawsuit alleges the company, which operates more than 50 junkyards and recycling smelters, used for processing scrape metals including lead, failed to replace the dust collection system at its Terminal Island, Calif., site after it was destroyed in a 2007 explosion. The plant then allegedly continued to operate the site without replacing the system.

Dust collection systems, an integral air pollution control method,  are used to filter out harmful particles from the emissions of industrial sources. These compounds include particles from combustion, such as ash and soot, mercury and other volatile organic compounds.

The plant, in trying get by without installing dust collection system, apparently had hoped to avoid the capital costs associated with installing a new system, and then operated the systems. In the end, the plants have been fined well in excess of the system install costs, and, in addition, are being forced to install the dust collection equipment at sites in San Pedro, as well as Kern and Orange counties in California.

Recently, the EPA has tightened existing clean air regulations and standards, making air pollution control technology vital to ensuring compliance. The National Ambient Air Quality Standards and National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants regulations--among many others--were revised to include more stringent emissions limits for particulate matter (PM2.5 or particulates smaller than 2.5 microns) and other pollutants. The EPA also recently codified the long-awaited Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. These regulations require coal-burning operations, such as coal-fired power plants, to reduce mercury emissions to acceptable levels using the most efficient current technology, known as Maximum Achievable Control Technology. Dust collection technology is integral to meeting all of these standards.

The funds collected from the settlement will be divided among several different organizations, including the California State Department of Toxic Substances Control, 11 marina operators, the University of California and Coalition for Safe Environment.

Fabric dust collection systems work by forcing the dirty air through a set of filter bags that are housed within an enclosure, known as a baghouse, before releasing the air into the atmosphere. Periodically, the filters are cleaned, usually using a system of compressed air within the baghouse to blow off the excess dust buildup, known as filter cake, which is then dropped into a hopper to be either disposed of in landfills or used in other products, such as in cement production.

With increasingly strict federal and state environmental regulations, companies around the country can learn from the mistakes in this example, and consider the potential pitfalls of reluctancting to invest in pollution control technology and its potential impact on their bottom line.

About the Author

Dominick DalSanto is an author and environmental technologies expert, specializing in dust collection systems. He is currently the online marketing director and content manager at Baghouse.com.

Posted on Oct 17, 2011 at 12:43 PM


Comments

Wed, Jul 25, 2012 Dominick DalSanto Buenos Aires, Argentina

Thank you for your comments. I am glad you found the article informative.

Thu, Jun 14, 2012 dust extraction http://www.luhrfilter.com.au/about-us.php

There are various technologies used to control air pollution. You have provided excellent information about the air pollution control technologies. Nice information, many thanks to the author.

Mon, Oct 24, 2011 Dominick Dalsanto California, USA

I think history is clear that corporate interests do not usually aline with those of the public. The EPA was founded to protect the public from harm caused by corporate greed. That being said, whether or not the EPA has gone to far is debatable, and I will say that any extreme position either way will run into problems.

Sun, Oct 23, 2011 greg gilsdorf

It's past time for our legislators to take back control of our country and eliminate the epa and other vestiges of economic fascism promoted by the bully boy technonerds. I can only hope you epa ers will be able to survive in the real world without the sugartit from the nanny state.

Tue, Oct 18, 2011 Bruce Allen Pennsylvania

Does EPA believe first line of defense in emissions control is containment pressure vessels and process piping if infrastructure is kept in good sound operable condition, and violator can show basic good monitoring practices without breach of containment. Will EPA accept this best practice criteria as OSHA 1910.1-A does?

Tue, Oct 18, 2011

The previous owner of record of the Anaheim facility was George Adams. The same George Adams who commented here? Hummm.........

Tue, Oct 18, 2011

It is about time EPA tighten it's belt. These companies have just written fines off as cost of doing business; I'm glad they have been hit were it hurts!!!!!!!

Tue, Oct 18, 2011 Bill Suncook NH

I love hearing about people/companies getting busted for doing the wrong things, no matter how miner. Just do the right thing and all will be well.

Tue, Oct 18, 2011

Re: date of violations - sounds like SA did not do a very good "due diligence" review when it acquired the scrapyards - what this a matter of lack of knowledge of a businees practice that has been strongly recommended since the 1970's, or an attempt by a party to avoid liability by re-organizing/name-changing?

Mon, Oct 17, 2011 Samuel Manila, Philippines

Great article, it was a real eye opener for our business...

Mon, Oct 17, 2011 Dominick Dalsanto California, USA

The source for the article was a release by the EPA, which did not mention anything about a previous owner being responsible for the infractions. Can you provide a link to the release you are referring to?

Mon, Oct 17, 2011 George Adams

If you read the settlement, you will see that the violations occured in May of 07. SA wasnt formed until Sept. 07. These violations were from the prior owners, that SA inherited.

Mon, Oct 17, 2011 Dominick DalSanto California, USA

Looks great!

Sat, Oct 15, 2011 Scott Wesley Arizona USA

We have a bio source system that has ZERO CARBON EMISSIONS, which takes most any bio source and eliminates it and converts to renewable energy. MP BioMass can take; fly ash~coal ash, lawn debris, wood chips, petroleum waste, sludge, garbage, and more and thermal chemically process it to electricity which can be funneled into the grid, oxygen ~ grade 5, and methanol. We have been doing this since 2003, have facilities models to prove it, and have one of the finest scientific foundations and engineering firms in the world backing us. Please feel free to visit us at Facebook! We welcome your comments... http://www.facebook.com/mpbiomass Scott Wesley Principal

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above