Biofuel Producers Form Association to Address Inequities

Advanced biofuel producers have formed the Low Carbon Synthetic Fuels Association (LCSFA), with members including TRI, Rentech Inc., Velocys, Choren, Flambeau River Biofuels/Johnson Timber, AP Fuels and World GTL.

The LCSFA was formed to address existing legislative and regulatory inequities that have slowed or even hindered the development of advanced biofuels. To date, federal programs have resulted in incentives that do not necessarily promote or reward the best performing and most environmentally friendly fuels.

Specifically, the LCSFA represents the biomass-to-liquids (BtL) industry. BtL is produced through the gasification of renewable biomass and the subsequent conversion of the gasified biomass using the Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) synthesis process. The renewable fuels produced are predominantly synthetic diesel and jet fuel, which are nearly identical to current crude oil-derived fuels but cleaner. BtL fuels can be produced from abundant, non-food organic materials such as wood waste from urban recycling programs, paper mills or forestry residues. They are fully compatible with the existing fuels infrastructure, enhance engine performance, and reduce emissions.

“We look forward to advanced biofuels mandated by Congress that will ensure the safe use and performance of the more than 400 million engine products in use today. LCSFA members may offer a viable solution to achieving national renewable fuel mandates,” said Kris Kiser, executive vice president of the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute and spokesperson for AllSAFE, a national manufacturing coalition of major onroad and nonroad engine, vehicle, and equipment manufacturers whose members’ products consume gasoline, diesel, and the variety of biofuels that are blended with those conventional fuels.

Through LCSFA, participants along the whole value chain (from biomass feedstock producers, gasification and F-T technology providers, and project developers, to consumers of the product and manufacturers of affected engines, vehicles and equipment) can speak with one voice to achieve needed improvements and incentives.

On Sept. 25, the LCSFA urged the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in its comments to promote clean, renewable advanced biofuels that improve air quality, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and are compatible with the existing engines, equipment and fuels infrastructure. The LCSFA’s comments are endorsed by Auburn University, Audi America, Chemrec AB, Mercedes Benz USA, Pacific Renewable Fuels, Renewable Energy Institute International, and Volkswagen.

The expansion of the Renewable Fuels Standard by Congress creates substantial mandates for advanced biofuels, and BtL fuels could ultimately contribute significantly to meeting such mandates. According to Jim McVaney, vice president, Government Affairs for Rentech Inc., “A well constructed renewable fuels standard that rewards fuels for their quality, performance and ability to reduce emissions will clearly be helpful to the growth of BtL fuels.”

According to William Guerry, who serves as general counsel and represents the LCSFA before EPA and other government entities, “Through the implementation of the RFS2, the EPA has the opportunity to avoid picking favorites and move toward a regulatory structure that sets goals and rewards the best technology solutions. This will give fuel producers, marketers and even consumers greater flexibility when deciding how they comply with the new, higher mandates for renewable fuel use.”



Comments

Mon, Oct 12, 2009 Washington

I have worked in the biofuel field and I can confirm your conclusion for most biofuels. Corn is the worst of the selection. Soy and rape seed are not much better. Biofuels such as algae take less input to grow compared to corn such as fertilizers and pesticides. Algae can grow on wastewater effluent. It also thrives on agricultural runoff. Also, algae aren't food crops. Biofuels such as algae take less input to grow compaired to corn such as fertilizers and pesticides. but I am unsure of the process of collecting and processing into biofuels for algae.

Wed, Oct 7, 2009 Frank Hutchinson Florida

Before we continue the march towards increase percentages in gaoline and diesel fuel of biofuels we MUST accomplish two tasks. ONE, the resulting mixture must be safe and compatible will ALL engines. This includes small engines such as the lawn mowers and larger engines such as marine engines which are vented. To date I do not believe this has been done. TWO, the goverment should perform and publish a production vs. yield btu analysis of the mixtures as compared to the basic fuel, gasoline or diesel. My brief study indicates that it takes more btus to produce a btu that is yielded. This would also include a carbon footprint for production vs. yield. The whole Ethanol thing, in m opinion, has been another feel good approach to the environment that really has a negative impact when looking at the total picture from the planting to yield process.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above