Epstein Calls for FDA, EPA to Ban Uses of Fluoride

Cancer Prevention Coalition head offers up evidence that the chemical is linked to bone cancer in young boys.

Cancer Prevention Coalition Chair Samuel S. Epstein, M.D., said recently that "A ban by the FDA on fluoridated toothpaste is well overdue, as is a ban by the EPA on the fluoridation of drinking water."

Epstein said a ban would protect people against the risks of bone cancer from the use of fluoride in most toothpaste and from the fluoridation of drinking water.

In 1977, the National Academy of Sciences expressed concerns on the strong relation between the fluoridation of drinking water and risks of bone cancer to young boys, Epstein pointed out. And, a decade later, the International Agency for Research on Cancer reported that fluorides in drinking water induced bone cancer in rats. This finding was confirmed by the National Toxicology Program in its 1989, 1990, and 1991 reports.

"Not surprisingly, Procter & Gamble, the leading manufacturer of fluoridated toothpastes, denied that these results were statistically significant," Epstein said. "Surprisingly, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) supported this claim."

Evidence for the bone cancer link comes from studies and reports from the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the New Jersey Department of Health, and Harvard University. In 1990, the NCI reported that, based on an analysis of 1973 to 1987 data, the incidence of a bone cancer, known as osteosarcoma, was increased in males under the age of 20 living in areas where the drinking water was fluoridated. In 1992, the New Jersey Department of Health published a study confirming higher rates of bone cancer in young boys living in fluoridated versus non-fluoridated areas of the state. And in 1993, an independent analysis of the 1990 NCI data confirmed excess risks and deaths from bone cancer in young boys exposed to fluoride. These findings were confirmed in a 2001 report by the Harvard School of Dental Medicine. In 2006, a Harvard University team of scientists published a study reporting a five-fold increased risk of bone cancer in teenage boys who had drunk fluoridated water between the ages of 6 and 8. Apart from exposure to fluoride in drinking water, these finding also incriminated fluoride commonly added to toothpaste.

"Concerns on fluoride as a major avoidable cause of bone cancer are further and urgently validated by its unrecognized 20 percent increased incidence in children under the age of 15 over the last three decades," Epstein said, "as documented in the 1975-2007 National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results report."

On Jan. 7, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced steps to ensure that standards and guidelines on fluoride in drinking water continue to provide the maximum protection to support good dental health, especially in children. HHS is proposing that the recommended level of fluoride in drinking water can be set at the lowest end of the current optimal range to prevent tooth decay, and EPA is initiating review of the maximum amount of fluoride allowed in drinking water.

Epstein is professor emeritus of Environmental and Occupational Medicine at the University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health.

Comments

Mon, Apr 16, 2012 Nathan

This is the most chilling video I have seen on the poisonous effects of placing flouride in the water supply.Here is the link;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCyk8wPvnDM

Tue, Mar 29, 2011 Mark Michigan

Hello: I guess this begs the question, has someone done a study to see if a substantial portion of the population (define substantial) is now using flouride in toothpaste such that we don't need to have it in municipal water supply? If we are already buying it in toothpaste, do we really need it in the water? However, the recent studies appear to limit fluoride impacts to children, a common sense rationale (smaller bodies mean a smaller mass to absorp the dose). The solution may be parental - keep your children from using fluoride toothpaste if you have fluoridated water.

Fri, Mar 25, 2011 David A.W. Burla Hamilton, ON

TRUE FACTS: SODIUM FLUORIDE = MIND CONTROL At the end of the Second World War, the United States Government sent Charles Eliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants in Germany. While there he was told by the German chemists of a scheme which had been worked out by them during the war and adopted by the German General Staff. This was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water. In this scheme, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place. Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination by slowly POISONING and NARCOTISING a certain area of the brain and will thus make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. "Both the Germans and the Russians added sodium fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile." "The PINEAL GLAND and MELATONIN or THIRD EYE": This Gland has been shrunken to size that severs to whom you are. You cannot connect to the source. It becomes a BLOCKED CHAKRA! The window of your mind has been closed and when some one talks about the "other side" you freak out like a zombie. That is why in America they have MEAT HEADS, BIRD BRAINS and NUMB SKULLS.

Sun, Mar 20, 2011 Richard H Ottawa

Hey James, old or not, a study is still valid. A rat is still a rat, whether it was born yesterday or 100 years ago. What kind of fellow are you? You are not very professional by not elaborating on your claim of "bad correlations," however, that there is even the remotest possibility of evidence of harm is reason enough to require a moratorium on the practice until definite reliable and valid data are available to prove that there is no harm.

Mon, Jan 31, 2011

We recieve Fluoride on many levels in addition to the naturally occuring amounts in our water, why do we need to add it to begin with?? especially when your the one having to handle the fluoride. Asking any Water Treatment Operator of the Risks/Hazards assoiciated with handling.

Fri, Jan 28, 2011

Why do we put anything in the water without proper long-term comprehensive testing first, seems irresponsible? What's the harm in taking out the Flouride?

Thu, Jan 27, 2011 Straightpath

Perhaps there is something to this. Japan and most of the European already ban fluoride. Could all those scientists and public health officials be wrong? Are we late at recognizing the risk? Sounds like a full review is needed.

Wed, Jan 26, 2011 Micki

http://www.icnr.com/articles/fluoride-deposition.html http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19159082 http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/pineal/

Wed, Jan 26, 2011 james kahle, PE

The Epstein cited studies are old historical bad correlations -- and I am a fellow UofI environmental engineer.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above