Researchers Take Big Step to Develop Nuclear Fusion Power

University of Tennessee researchers have successfully developed a key technology in developing an experimental reactor that can demonstrate the feasibility of fusion energy for the power grid. Nuclear fusion promises to supply more energy than the nuclear fission used today but with far fewer risks.
 
Mechanical, aerospace and biomedical engineering professors David Irick, Madhu Madhukar and Masood Parang are engaged in a project involving the United States, five other nations, and the European Union, known as ITER. UT researchers completed a critical step this week for the project by successfully testing their technology this week that will insulate and stabilize the central solenoid—the reactor's backbone.
 
ITER is building a fusion reactor that aims to produce 10 times the amount of energy that it uses. The facility is now under construction near Cadarache, France, and will begin operations in 2020.
 
"The goal of ITER is to help bring fusion power to the commercial market," Madhukar said. "Fusion power is safer and more efficient than nuclear fission power. There is no danger of runaway reactions like what happened in nuclear fission reactions in Japan and Chernobyl, and there is little radioactive waste." Unlike today's nuclear fission reactors, fusion uses a similar process as that which powers the sun.
 
Since 2008, UT engineering professors and about 15 students have worked inside UT's Magnet Development Laboratory (MDL) located off of Pellissippi Parkway to develop technology that serves to insulate and provide structural integrity to the more than 1,000 ton central solenoid.
 
A tokamak reactor uses magnetic fields to confine the plasma—a hot, electrically charged gas that serves as the reactor fuel—into the shape of a torus. The central solenoid, which consists of six giant coils stacked on top of one another, plays the starring role by both igniting and steering the plasma current.
 
The key to unlocking the technology was finding the right material—a glass fiber and epoxy chemical mixture that is liquid at high temperatures and turns hard when cured—and the right process of inserting this material into all of the necessary spaces inside the central solenoid. The special mixture provides electrical insulation and strength to the heavy structure. The impregnation process moves the material at the right pace, factoring in temperature, pressure, vacuum and the material's flow rate.

This week, the UT team tested the technology inside its mockup of the central solenoid conductor.
 
"During the epoxy impregnation, we were in a race against time," said Madhukar. "With the epoxy, we have these competing parameters. The higher the temperature, the lower the viscosity; but at the same time, the higher the temperature, the shorter the working life of the epoxy."
 
It took two years to develop the technology, more than two days to impregnate the central solenoid mockup and multiple pairs of watchful eyes to ensure everything went according to plan.
 
It did.
 
This summer, the team's technology will be transferred to US ITER industry partner General Atomics in San Diego, which will build the central solenoid and ship it to France.
 
ITER—designed to demonstrate the scientific and technological feasibility of fusion power—will be the world's largest tokamak. As an ITER member, the US receives full access to all ITER-developed technology and scientific data, but bears less than 10 percent of the construction cost, which is shared among partner nations. US ITER is a Department of Energy Office of Science project managed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

 

Comments

Wed, Jun 13, 2012 Orimark Bhubaneswar

Hey, Technology has affected the people a lot both positively and negatively. There is many positive points but the negative is that the people are becoming more lazy and dependent. The students are remarkably different from the past generation. They just start thinking when we stop thinking. Hoping for a good and advanced generation next…! http://www.orimarktechnologies.com/digital-marketing-services/e DOT mergicmailarray.html

Mon, Jun 11, 2012

I don't know who wrote this article, but I take issue with a couple of statements. First, while the Chernobyl accident was caused by a "runaway" nuclear reaction, there was no such reaction at Fukushima; the accident there was caused by an inability to remove decay from shut-down reactors because of the loss of all electrical power at the plant site. As for the claim that fusion power is "safer and more efficient" than fission power, while this may be true "on paper," it is yet to be proven. Since no one has built and operated a fusion power reactor, there is no way to demonstrate that it can operate either more safely or more efficiently than a fission power plant. Perhaps we'll see that it does in 10 or 15 (or more) years, but to make such a claim now is wishful thinking, not scientific fact.

Mon, Jun 11, 2012 Sam

A self-sustaining fusion reactor, more energy out than in, can only be possible with electrostatic acceleration. Electrostatic fusion machine is that will power mankind’s future energy needs with safe and clean aneutronic fusion fuels. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro5-QYqqxzM

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above