Food for Thought: The Most Earth-Friendly Way to Dispose of Food Waste

Consider the apple core. From an environmental perspective, what’s the most responsible way to dispose of it, or a banana peel, or any food waste?

A new study about the impact of various food waste disposal systems has shown that putting it into a garbage disposer results in lower global warming potential than putting it in the trash and sending it to a landfill. That’s a key finding of the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) commissioned by InSinkErator, a division of Emerson, and the world’s leading manufacturer of food waste disposers.

As set forth in the report, if a community of 30,000 households (the size of Newport Beach, Calif.) were to switch from sending food scraps to the landfill to using a disposer instead, the reduction in global warming potential would be the equivalent of eliminating nearly 2,100 tons of carbon dioxide emissions. This is akin to eliminating about 4.6 million miles of car traffic.

According to the EPA, landfills are a major source of methane, a greenhouse gas at least 21 times more potent than carbon dioxide. Because food scraps are a significant component of waste that municipalities send to landfills, diverting it for recycling into resources is becoming a major goal of cities worldwide. Enter food waste disposers, which pulverize food scraps and send the resulting slurry to the various wastewater treatment systems evaluated in the LCA.

Many advanced wastewater treatment plants can convert food scraps into renewable energy through a process called anaerobic digestion. At these plants food scraps can also be turned into fertilizer products, also known as biosolids, which can help build healthy soils.

Unlike studies that review and compare competing products, the LCA assesses the environmental impact of the four primary systems for managing food scraps – wastewater treatment, landfills, incineration and advanced composting. Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM) conducted the initial analysis used by PE INTERNATIONAL, Inc. (formerly PE Americas) to produce the LCA following ISO 14040 standards, including review by an independent panel of experts.

The LCA analyzed several critical environmental impacts: global warming potential (trapping heat that would otherwise pass out of the earth’s atmosphere), eutrophication potential (excessive vegetative growth in bodies of water from high concentrations of nutrients), acidification potential (increase in the acidity of water and soil), smog formation, and the energy demands associated with each system.

The report states that food scraps processed through a wastewater treatment plant with anaerobic digestion and cogeneration can even result in a reduction of global warming potential. It also concludes that processing of food scraps at these advanced wastewater treatment facilities has lower energy demand – less than landfills, incineration and centralized composting.

Comments

Thu, Aug 18, 2011

Of course nobody has worried about the WATER wasted while sending all of it down the garbage disposal! Composting has reduced our food waste to almost nothing! We also have one of the lowest water usage in our city, as we use gray water to water the plants and vegatables. We did away with the lawn which is a total waste of water and space.

Tue, Aug 16, 2011

feed it to your chickens and harvest the eggs

Tue, Aug 16, 2011

I can't imagine that a study sponsored by InSinkerator would find that the disposal was the most environmentally-friendly way to dispose of food wastes. Hmmmmm, imagine that.

Tue, Aug 16, 2011 Michael Keleman Racine

The electricity to manufacture and use the disposer was included in the evaluation. Composting was indeed evaluated and the advanced treatment plant (anaerobic digestion with energy capture) performed better than composting.

Tue, Aug 16, 2011

In theory what they say in not untrue but in reality the first thing that happens at a wastewater treatment plant is to screen the water to remove the solids. This food waste and debris goes to a landfill. I would estimate that less than 30% of food waste that goes thru a garbage disposal makes it to anerobic digestion.

Tue, Aug 16, 2011

What about the offset of greenhouse gasses produced from generating the electricity to manufacture and operate the garbage disposal?

Tue, Aug 16, 2011

Did the study compare composing to disposal via the disposal/WWTP? Which of those two would be less harmful to the environment? Without that comparison, it's disingenuous to state that using the sink's disposal unit is "the most earth-friendly way to dispose of food waste."

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above