Thomas Edison Descendants Support Choice in Bulbs: "Technology Changes. Embrace It"

Everything that can be said about the benefits of more energy-efficient light bulbs has been said. But not everyone has said it.

And we certainly have not heard--until now--from four direct descendants of Thomas Edison, the man who invented the incandescent light bulb 132 years ago.

They all strongly oppose a House vote seeking to limit consumer choice and block progress on more modern, more energy efficient bulbs. Here’s what they are saying, in comments provided to NRDC:

"I am appalled that any legislative body would be so narrow-minded as to discourage new and advanced technology. If my great-grandfather were alive today…he would have already moved on to the better, cleaner, sustainable technology well before certain legislators put their opinions into the mix…It is ironic that the very people who are supporting the legislation…are the ones who espouse free markets. Edison would certainly have recognized that the wave of the future-- profits--is to make it better, cheaper and, yes, cleaner and more efficient." – Barry Edison Sloane, great-grandson of Thomas A. Edison.

"Thomas Edison was a keen observer of the state of things around him, and was prolific with innovations to make the things around him better. He encouraged people to improve on his work, just as he improved on it himself. He would have thought inventing and commercializing substantially more efficient ways to provide light was long overdue… Edison would think that those who would manipulate this issue, this late in the game, to score ideological points, are misguided at best" – Heywood Sloane, great-grandson of Thomas A. Edison.

"Edison would be inventing a better bulb right now, and he would plan to generate a lot of new jobs and big profits as well as better light." – David Edison Sloane, great-grandson of Thomas Edison.

"The technology changes. Embrace it." – Robert Wheeler, grand nephew of Thomas A. Edison and president of the board of the Edison Birthplace Association.

Comments

Wed, Jul 20, 2011

I wish Thomas Edison was still around - we need better light bulbs but compact fluouescents with their mercury content and long warm up times aren't the answer.

Wed, Jul 20, 2011 M. Hughes Boston

"They all strongly oppose a House vote seeking to limit consumer choice..." What B.S. The bill to phase out incandescent bulbs is the bill that limits consumer choice. Fluorescent bulbs are expensive, don't last as long as claimed, and cast a sickly, yellow light. Awful! Stock up on incandescents while you can!

Tue, Jul 19, 2011 PC

Can anyone say 'misrepresentation of the facts' with this article? There is no effort to 'limit choice' with the current legislation, but rather to 'remove the limit of choice' that has been imposed on US Citizens by EPA, which will 'outlaw' the old light bulbs thereby limiting choice. Has no one read the EPA's website requiring 'evacuation' in the event of a 'fluorescent bulb breakage' due to the 'toxic nature' of the bulbs?

Tue, Jul 19, 2011 Manassas Mike Virginia

Thomas Edison's America did not have to contend with the USEPA, mindless bureaucrats, idiots like Al Gore and the other Chicken Littles, as well as a Congress that sticks its nose into every aspect of American life. If Tom Edison started out with his inventions today you can be sure the USEPA, DOE, Department of Commerce, and every other agency would be there to impede him.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above