Beyond the Barn: Keeping Dairy Cows Outside is Good for the Outdoors

Computer simulation studies by scientists at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) suggests that a dairy cow living year-round in the great outdoors may leave a markedly smaller ecological hoofprint than its more sheltered sisters.

Agricultural Research Service (ARS) agricultural engineer Al Rotz led a team that evaluated how different management systems on a typical 250-acre Pennsylvania dairy farm would affect the environment. ARS is USDA's chief intramural scientific research agency, and this work supports the USDA commitment to promoting sustainable agriculture. Rotz works at the ARS Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit in University Park, Pa.

For this study, Rotz and his team used the Integrated Farm System Model, a computer program that simulates the major biological and physical processes and interactions of a crop, beef, or dairy farm. The scientists collected a range of field data on grazing systems, manure management and their effects on nutrient loss to the environment. Then they used their farm model, supported by the field data, to evaluate the environmental dynamics of four different dairy farms in all types of weather over 25 years.

The model generated estimates for ammonia emissions from manure, soil denitrification rates, nitrate leaching losses, soil erosion and phosphorus losses from field runoff. Estimates for emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide from both primary production and the secondary production of pesticides, fuels, electricity, and other resources were also considered.

Compared to high-confinement systems, keeping dairy cows outdoors all year lowered levels of ammonia emission by about 30 percent. The model results also indicated that the total emissions for the greenhouse gases methane, nitrous oxide, and carbon dioxide were 8 percent lower in a year-round outdoor production system than they were in a high-production confinement system.

Another plus: When fields formerly used for feed crops were converted to perennial grasslands for grazing, carbon sequestration levels climbed from zero to as high as 3,400 pounds per acre every year. The results also suggested that a well-managed dairy herd kept outdoors year-round left a carbon footprint 6 percent smaller than that of a high-production dairy herd kept in barns.


Comments

Wed, Jun 1, 2011

they will not be happy until all our food is imported, and we become the 3rd world country

Tue, May 31, 2011

The only reason there was ever an "emissions" issue with cattle was a result of an anti-agriculture campaign from animal rights advocates and assorted vegetarian and vegan proponents. What seems to be missing from each and every "study" is the fact that in this country there's millions of acres which are, to successfully carry on ranching operations, being maintained with anti-erosion grasslands, eating massive quantities of CO2 which utterly obliterates any "footprint" which any given animal would leave. No concrete, no houses, no wal-marts, etc. etc. etc.: just massive expanses of vegetation sucking up CO2 like a hoover. The "carbon sequestration" weight figure mentioned is actually on average something on the order of three times the total weight of cattle which the same amount of land will support during the same period. There's a reason why people go to the country for the fresh air: this is it...

Tue, May 31, 2011 Doug Lozier Indianapolis

Why are all the regulatory agencies only considering DAIRY cattle? There are probably same or more head of beef cattle raised in the US. Plus add the numbers of similar livestock such as horses and a lesser number of sheep that live outdoors, Many farms also have hogs outdoors as well as the pre-market turkeys, ducks, and other poultry.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above