Mass-scale Algae Biodiesel Production Defies Physics, Study Says

Kansas State University researchers applied a carbon mass balance and found that the current algae diesel system will not eliminate U.S. dependence on petroleum diesel.

Companies looking to engineer an eco-friendly diesel fuel have more red lights in their path. According to Kansas State University researchers, making petroleum diesel completely green would not only bend the laws of physics, it would cost too much green.

Peter Pfromm, professor of chemical engineering, is a member of a K-State interdisciplinary team that analyzed oil produced by algae as a source of biodiesel.

Pfromm and K-State researchers Vincent Amanor-Boadu, associate professor of agricultural economics, and Richard Nelson with the Center for Sustainable Energy conducted an in-depth analysis on algae biodiesel production. Their first algae-related nonprofit study, "Sustainability of algae derived biodiesel: A mass balance approach," was published in Bioresource Technology, a peer-reviewed journal and is available for free from the K-State Research Exchange (click on the article title above).

The team applied engineering fundamentals ─ mainly a carbon mass balance ─ to put sustainability on a scientific footing, Pfromm said. The total mass of Earth never changes, and in order to be sustainable, mass conservation and especially a closed carbon mass balance must be maintained for the algae diesel production and consumption system, he said.

The researchers created a mass flowchart using carbon as a tracer, tracking it through the entire algae diesel system. This checked for use of non-sustainable resources like oil and gas and made sure the atmosphere wasn't a carbon dioxide dumping ground. Because an algae production facility creates biomass mainly from carbon dioxide, this carbon flow must be balanced out or sustainability doesn't work, Pfromm said.

"The inflow must equal the outflow if we want to be sustainable," he said. "Without this, our production cycle won't last for decades ─ or even centuries ─ and will instead deplete resources that can't be renewed and degrade our planet."

The first part of the study focused solely on the science and technology of algae biodiesel. It showed that from a purely technical standpoint, producing algae-based biodiesel in a sustainable way works, but not to the extent needed to eliminate dependence on petroleum diesel. With sustainability the goal, the team found that under the most optimal and optimistic conditions, the amount of algae diesel produced per day was drastically lower than the projected ideal quantities from many algae production concepts.

"We found that phycologists ─ algae scientists ─ maintain that some popular estimates of producing 200 to 500 grams of algae per square meter of open pond per day weren't feasible because there's simply not enough sunlight coming through the atmosphere to do so," Pfromm said. "Unless we can change the sun, such production is physically impossible ─ and the hard numbers prove that. Most economists wouldn't necessarily recognize this as an issue in a business plan because it's dictated by physics, not finances."

The team used a more realistic, yet still optimistic, production number ─ 50 grams per square meter per day. They determined it would take 11 square miles of open ponds making 14,000 tons of algae a day to replace 50 million gallons of petroleum diesel per year ─ about 0.1 percent of the U.S. annual diesel consumption ─ with an eco-friendly algae alternative.

"Algae don't make oil out of the kindness of their hearts. They store energy as oil when they are starved for nitrogen so they can make more algae in the future," Pfromm said. "The end result is the yield isn't that high because we can either stress the algae to produce more oil or let them reproduce very efficiently ─ not both."

The team added economics in a follow-up study, which has yet to be published.

"Once money is involved, technological sustainability becomes theoretical because nobody is going to use the technology or science unless there's an incentive," Pfromm said. "For investors and most of the industrial world, the incentive is going to come with a dollar sign. But if it takes 20 years before anyone starts making a buck in profit, no one's going to back it."

Open ponds are the cheapest containment unit in which to grow algae. But as a production facility increases in size, so do the number of ponds it operates, and a facility close to 11 square miles in size is a steep investment, Pfromm said. Biologically these open ponds are also problematic because they are prone to invasions by algae-eating organisms or microorganisms that can be spread by the wind.

Enclosures like tubes stop the algae-eating organisms and other contamination but have a much higher overhead. Cooling then becomes necessary because sunlight warms the containers and can overheat the algae. A refrigeration unit is too costly, which leaves water spray-cooling the cheapest alternative. Cooling one container isn't a problem, but cooling half-a-million containers quickly adds up, Pfromm said. These containers also have to be cleaned to avoid buildup, because dirty containers mean limited sunlight and limited production.

Absent government support and incentives, all of the building, maintenance, production and transportation costs are out of pocket for algae production. And with the underlying science heavily restricting production, the team's economical analysis finds finances will stay in the red for quite some time, Pfromm said.

But while market conditions, prices and costs can be changed by tinkering with subsidies, mandates, and policies, science ultimately cannot, Pfromm said.

"Right now the fundamentals are the problem. It doesn't matter how well we engineer our production machine, the engine under the hood just isn't that good," Pfromm said. "The best option right now is to invest in fundamental research and design so that the yield can hopefully reach beyond the 50 grams per square meter per day on our most optimistic assumption."

Source: Kansas State University

Comments

Sun, Jan 1, 2012 howard stern sugarland,tx

- Att:Dr.Pfromm PART 2 Algae fuel firms face moment of truth http://zolae-sternh.blogspot.com Re: My small Company with a compatible CHEMICAL Process Engineering Firm.and MY technology and systems, will produce 16,000,000 pounds on a demo project with very high energy POWDERED dry ALGAE with updated plant. I am planning at least thirty of these units throughout the U.S.with participating PARTNER(s), a Corporate entity. My current desire is finding an organization engaged in creating DIRECT HYDROGEN from high energy powdered Algae product to produce electrical power. The basic powdered method has been tested material that has been proven by the A/F on combat aircraft. Testing on trucks and military vehicles would be next objective. Howard Stern,Pres sugarLand Texas sternh@windstream.ne

Sun, Jan 1, 2012 howard stern Sugar Land,TX

I had your Comments, left for a few minutes and part of the message disappeared. But I repeat: YOU WERE ONTHE RIGHT PATH. ----------------------------- UPDATED... Algae fuel firms face moment of truth (Preface) SECOND Paragraph BBC Report) Relating to Algae production for U.S, Canada: I could have explained to DARPA employs and others, that the outlook for LIQUID ALGAE MIXED WITH 50-60% KEROSINE and THEIR LACK EXPERTISE in LIQUID ALGAE would be HIGHLY LIMITED and QUESTIONABLE from a productive standpoint: as presented below: I spent three decades in most related areas; Algae is, and was the rage of the day. but being a small Company with a great amount of technical production capability,it appears I was not acceptable. Eventually, a number of distinguished advisory organizations and universities came to the conclusion that the Industry was too slow and not efficient enough to make a difference in national emergency. Even BBC weighted in with a report a few days ago as outlined in the next paragraph. As a whole, with minor exceptions, are just involved in research (at least 20,000 more speces to check) and some university groups are estimating another ten+ years or more to get into normalcy in production. Will they then come up with realistic, not projected delusionary prices??? There were a number of companies that were critical of the algae Industry because of long periods of research and very little production with outrageous prices. And only now is DoD re-evaluating the Billions spent on these projects. The maximum production of dry algae prior to 1960's was 100 Tons per year, now 50+ YEARS LATER, even the largest producers can double, tripple, or go to 600 Tons per year for the few with this type of capability, would it make a difference for the A/F or commercial vendors? WHERE IS THE LOGIC??? Algae fuel firms face moment of truth As REPORTED BY BBC Posted: 07 Dec 2011 01:21 AM PST With the number of algae start-ups increasing around the world, it remains a harsh truth that none have been successful in producing fuel commercially and at scale. Several firms, including GreenFuel Technologies, have shut down. *** s Carbon Trust’s algae programme was shut down after the Government decided to scrap non-performing programs. Practical issues in the industry seem to be taking its toll. Development has been largely slow and profits have been practically non-existent. With such issues hanging around, it remains to be seen how much longer it will take for the industry to become viable on a commercial scale. http://www.bbc.co *** news/business-15947205 Additional Comments By Howard Stern 12/29/11 t

Wed, Apr 13, 2011 Bill

With this said, will it stop all the wasted money being spent following up on algae biodiesel. I think not.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above