What Is the True Cost of Powering an Electric Car?

Edmunds.com explains that this uncertainty is slowing consumer acceptance.

Edmunds.com analysts report that about 2.4 percent of all the new cars sold in 2010 were hybrid or electric. Despite the excitement surrounding the Volt, the Leaf and other new entries in the green car segment, Edmunds.com expects alternative vehicle market share to rise to just 3.7 percent in 2011, to 4.1 percent in 2012 and to 4.8 percent in 2013.

Part of the explanation for the slow consumer acceptance is the uncertainty of the new technology. For one thing, people are unsure how much it will cost to own these cars. Edmunds’ GreenCarAdvisor.com was among the media outlets to report that the Chevy Volt is expected to get the equivalent of 93 miles to the gallon while running on battery and the Nissan Leaf is expected to get 99 MPGe.

But correlating the electricity costs of an electric car with the fuel costs of a traditional gasoline car was no easy task for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, let alone for consumers now considering purchasing an electric car.

"The true cost of filling up your electric car turns out to be far more complicated than anyone expected and, in many cases, far more costly than it would appear at first glance," reported Edmunds.com Features Editor Carroll Lachnit in her article "The True Cost of Powering an Electric Car." "The cost of a 'fill-up' depends largely on when and where you recharge it, not to mention the rates of the utility company used."

In the report, Lachnit analyzes several electric cars in a variety of regions in the United States under different recharging conditions. One interesting discovery: powering a 2011 Nissan Leaf in Hawaii would cost about the same as the fuel costs for a gasoline car that gets an average of 36 mpg. The article also explains how consumers can calculate their real-world costs for powering these cars.

Another article, "Decoding the Electric Car MPG" looks at EPA's window sticker on electric cars that shows the fuel economy equivalent, what the agency calls MPGe. "The issue is that this rating really doesn't have much to do with fuel economy," says Paul Seredynski, senior editor at Edmunds' AutoObserver.com. "The MPGe rating is only useful for comparing the relative energy consumption of gasoline (or hybrid) cars with that of electric cars." Seredynski also points out that EPA uses the national average for electricity costs, even though electricity costs vary much more widely than gasoline costs across the country. For more details, read "The True Cost of Powering an Electric Car," at www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/the-true-cost-of-powering-an-electric-car.html, and "Decoding the Electric Car MPG," at www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/decoding-electric-car-mpg.html.

"There is a high cost of pushing new technology into the market which should come down over time if sales volumes increase and economies of scale come into play. Also, while we expect both gas and electricity prices to rise, we think gasoline prices will rise at a much steeper rate, increasing the savings an EV or plug-in hybrid owner might realize," commented Edmunds' GreenCarAdvisor.com's John O'Dell, who covers this in more detail at http://blogs.edmunds.com/greencaradvisor/2011/01/cheaper-watts-for-volts-leafs-and-other-electric-drive-vehicles.html.

Comments

Wed, Feb 2, 2011 Mike T. California

The article is really about the 'true' cost of energy required for the new Electric Vehicles, not the necessarily the cost of hybrids. What has not been discussed or addressed: A 'real' alternative and the 'total energy costs'. A 'real' solution needs to be one that provides for the replacement of trucks, as they are among the largest users. For those unfamiliar with the needs of trucks or those eager to pay someone else to haul your stuff around, trucks are still very necessary. The 'total energy costs' also need to be considered. Consider how much energy it takes to build these hybrids and electric vehicles and how much energy is wasted when you abandoned your old car. If you do the math, you will see that the energy ROI is not as favorable. I am not talking direct costs, but indirect costs that we all pay for when you abandoned a perfectly good vehicle for a newer vehicle (which may not be that case for all). Short sided mentalities is surely what has the world in a bind today, lets just hope that people start thinking about their choices instead of hoping on bandwagons.

Wed, Feb 2, 2011

Wait until bamy and his buddies start putting a tax on electricity used for vehicles. We already pay a gasoline tax. I just don't know how long it will be before washington taxes electricity for road use. They will probably wait until the demand goes up for them and there are a bunch on the road so people won't have and alternative. That tax should change the economics.

Tue, Feb 1, 2011 Marty

Such pessimism! It's not just fuel savings. Electric cars don't require oil changes and tuneups. Also the brakes last longer due to regenerative braking. My Prius has 75,000 miles and still has 70% of its brakes left. It may never require a brake job. Consumer Reports just retested a 9-yr old 2002 Prius with over 200,000 miles on it and its fuel mileage and 0-60 mph were just as good as when it was tested new.
Admit it; you are just feeling guilty about your gas guzzler!

Tue, Feb 1, 2011 Mark Michigan

Hello: Electric cars, not hybrids, have special operational concerns that fit a certain driving style. Batteries typically don't work as well when it is cold. For example, the Michigan cold climate would possibly reduce the driving range of a fully electric automobile during the winter. Also, it may take too long to recharge in the winter again because of the cold. The cold climate impact to batteries has to be factored in with the typical trip lengths. I'd hate to have a battery go dead sooner than anticipated during a winter trip; there isn't a handy electric outlet along the side of the road. Another problem is the resale value of a fully electric or hydrbid vehicle. The resale may not be important to some consumers, but suggestions in the marketplace indicate nobody will buy a used hybrid once the battery pack is no longer operational.

Thu, Jan 27, 2011

I had an 07 Honda Civic, tires every 20.000. Requries trans fluid change about every other oil change. Batteries failed after three years, then the thing was recalled to reprogram battery use (and lower mileage). Electrical problems too. Hauling hundred of pounds of batteries on the interstate doesn't make sense. Only got 4-5 mpg more with normal, real dirving. A regular Civic would have been better. What about all the pollution in making and disposing of the batteries? Wasted $$$.

Wed, Jan 26, 2011 Dave Kansas City, MO

Please don't comment if you don't know what you're talking about. While the article is electric powered vehicle discussion, too many inaccurate comments are made about the article. I've had a 2004 Honda Civic Hybrid that continues to get between 40-45 mpg and as high as 48 mpg on a trip. I get approximately 500 miles on a 12-gallon tank. I have 125,000 miles on my car and have only had to do normal maintenance. I get regular oil/filter changes around 5,000 miles. I've had one set of tires and getting ready for a second set. I've had to replace one engine battery. I'm getting ready to replace the original spark plugs. I just replaced the original anti-freeze prior to winter. My large hybrid battery has been checked and absolutely no issues. While this once new technology questioned the longevity of the hybrid battery life and cost (especially maintenance), I can say mine is going to last me for duration of my car, which I plan for over 200,000 miles, at least. Fuel cost? With gasoline near $3.00 per gallon, I've more than made up for any offset costs of purchasing a hybrid vehicle. While I was once questioned on my vehicle choice, people are now envious over my fuel mileage (with current and upcoming fuel costs) and want to discuss this type of vehicle in their next vehicle purchase.

Mon, Jan 24, 2011 Ron

It's all one electric grid. My estimate that 50% is probably a low one on a nationwide (or continent-wide) basis. Once the power is in the grid, how can you trace where your kilowatthour came from? The fact is, electric cars are in reality mainly coal-powered given the current derivation of electricity on even a world-wide basis. Even so, name for me a source of electric power that is not under some sort of assault from the environmentalist crowd. Hydroelectric? - no, Nuclear - no, Wind - better, but under assault because of bird deaths in certain regions along with the NIMBY syndrome, Solar panels are not yet under assault, but most people are not aware of the toxic materials in their construction. As soon as they are in widespread use, that'll change.

Wed, Jan 19, 2011 Bill

I believe that most of the people buying these electric vehicles are only thinking of the high mileage with less gasoline ratio and that less pollution will be generated. They are not really thinking of the cost to operate them. They are just thinking of the good that will come out of this. In turn the automakers knowing this will make more money.

Tue, Jan 18, 2011 Don - CA

Good article about the true cost of operating an electric vehicle. But not much has been said about how to keep eCars going when production starts ramping up. Ever notice how the market reacts to consumer use. Our electric grid is antiquated and runs quite close to its maximum output. Only limited expansion to the grid is underway. What happens on a hot day when everyone plugs in there car and there is not enough electricity to run air conditioners and computers? We have rolling brown or black outs now! The price of electricity will jump and it will take TIME for the grid to come in line with the increased demand, if it can catch up. What will the MPHe be then? Hopefully the air, heat, and solid waste pollution generated from the new large electricity generating systems that will be needed will be better than running gasoline engines, but the balance of all these systems does not seem to be well understood yet. Being GREEN may not be so green.

Tue, Jan 18, 2011 Ernie H Boise

People arn't stupid and the overall cost of this car (Battery replacement, electric costs, enhanced use of coal, limited range except for the city-bound and so on) is not the main reason many won't touch this type of car. You will never recover the cost in gas savings, newer models will obsolete your e-car every 2-3 years but will not improve this dismal outcome, ...BUT the Main Reason is that more and more people are realizing that Carbon Dioxide (CO2) has nothing to do with pollution or Global Warming making this whole scene a hoax! And more and more people are realizing that America has enough of its own OIL to make us energy independent for 500 years. Let us produce our own oil and add safe Nuclear Energy plants (remember, the Navy has been running safely on Nuclear fuel for 50 years!).

Tue, Jan 18, 2011 Chris NC

The other big potential cost factor that is not addressed here is the cost of replacement batteries and the associated disposal costs. The batteries WILL wear out and will have to be replaced and part or all of the old ones will have to be disposed of and/or recycled. Any decision made without evaluating this could end up being a mistake. It's pretty rare to have to replace a fuel tank, and if you have to replace it, the old one could bring in scrap metal value.

Tue, Jan 18, 2011 Peter

Ron, coal usage for electricity also varies accross the country. In most of California we only use coal for about 2% of our electricity. Also this article fails to mention that you can generate your own electricity at home with solar panels. It's hard to make your own gasoline, although biodiesel is easier to make your self.

Mon, Jan 17, 2011 Ron

I'm not so sure that gasoline prices will rise faster than electricity rates. A quick review of the past several years shows that increases inelectric rates in my area have far outpaces gasoline. On top of that, in reality, aren't electric cars powered 50% by coal in the U.S.? (And isn't coal under a very vigorous assault from the "Global Climate Change" crowd?

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above