More Injuries Reported for BP Oil Spill Wildlife Cleanup Workers

In June and July 2010, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) evaluated potential exposures and health effects of workers involved in Deepwater Horizon response activities due to the BP oil spill.

The evaluation included on-shore wildlife cleaning and rehabilitation workers (pdf) in Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi. NIOSH investigators assessed site factors and surveyed workers to collect information on demographics, job duties, occupational exposure to oil or other agents, and health symptoms experienced. Birds were the most common type of wildlife being cleaned and rehabilitated at the centers. For nearly all health outcomes, more injuries and symptoms were reported among wildlife cleaning workers than among a comparison group.

Among the most commonly reported health conditions, scrapes and cuts were reported by two-thirds of workers and itchy or red skin or rash were reported by nearly one-half. Occupational factors unique to wildlife cleaning and rehabilitation likely contributed to the health conditions reported. These factors included: skin contact with oil on the wildlife and in cleaning water; skin exposure to detergents and cleaners; persistent wet skin; and frequent handling and awkward lifting and moving of wildlife and cages.

An occupational health concern common among all Deepwater Horizon response workers was heat stress from work in a hot and humid environment.

NIOSH recommended continuing heat stress management plans and use of protective equipment to minimize skin and mucus membrane contact with oil and oil-contaminated water, measures to reduce ergonomic hazards, housekeeping to prevent slippery surfaces, and encouraging workers to report and seek care for health concerns and injuries.

Comments

Tue, Oct 26, 2010 John NY

I hope BP paid for this useless "evaluation" and not my tax dollars.

Tue, Oct 26, 2010 W

I guess this is okay if you buy into the info provided. For a long time the US Coast Guard followed the BP company line in their reporting. We now know that much of that spill information was false, and the US Coast Guard would not report otherwise. Now this is the latest from the US' government & BP partnership. And I am supposed to believe the government and BP in this case. Credibility has to be restored first.

Tue, Oct 26, 2010 Don USA

This article is reporting trivia. Did you ever get red hands and dry skin while washing dishes at home? Ever get tried and sore after working all day. I have. There is not one mention of a significant injury or illness. Workers at the Oil Spill were watched and scrutinized probably more than any other response in history. BP encouraged ALL workers to report ALL work related injuries and illnesses, which were tracked and evaluated to see if there was a better way. Work tasks were continually modified to make them better. Safety professionals were assigned to oversee all aspects of the Cleanup. I know, I was there, but I did not get to see them wash the birds. That was a special group.

Tue, Oct 26, 2010 PatDuval Boston

Not for nothing but cuts, scrapes, itchy skin, and possible heat stroke is what NOISH came up with? I get the same symptoms from cutting my grass on the weekends.

Tue, Oct 26, 2010 Mark Michigan

Hello Shepton: The answer to your questions is "Yes". None of the above "injuries" are life threatening or of immediate concern since they are items remedied by standard industry practice. This is not new information.

Mon, Oct 25, 2010 Shepton UK

Why is it that in 30 years I have never suffered nor has my response team suffered spill releated injuries or health problems.Is the is a problem because of 1) Lack of or incorrect personal protective equipment? 2) Imagined problems due to the likelihood of large compensation awards in the US

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above