More Oxygen Needed to Finish Exxon Valdez Spill Cleanup, Study Says

Traces of crude oil that linger on the shores of Alaska’s Prince William Sound after the Exxon Valdez oil spill remain highly biodegradable, despite almost 20 years of weathering and decomposition, scientists are reporting in a new study.

Their findings, which appear in Environmental Science & Technology, suggest a simple approach for further cleaning up remaining traces of the Exxon Valdez spill. To view the full article, click on this title, “Biodegradability of Lingering Crude Oil 19 Years after the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.”

Albert D. Venosa, Ph.D., and colleagues note that bacteria, evaporation, sunlight, and other items in Mother’s Nature’s cleanup kit work together to break down the oil and make it disappear. Scientists have known for years that adding nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer to oil-contaminated soil can speed the growth of bacteria that decompose, or biodegrade, oil. But it has been uncertain whether oil that has lingered in the environment for almost 20 years still is biodegradable, leaving questions on whether further cleanup efforts might be worthwhile.

Venosa is director of the Land Remediation and Pollution Control Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory for The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The scientists collected oil-contaminated soil from different beaches in Prince William Sound and treated the samples with phosphorus and nitrogen fertilizer in the presence of excess oxygen from the air. According to their results, oil in the fertilized samples biodegraded up to twice as fast as oil in the unfertilized control samples, but significant biodegradation occurred even in the unfertilized controls. Oxygen supply was the major bottleneck, or limiting factor, in the field that prevented further oil decomposition.

The scientists used data from the research to postulate a treatment scheme that would involve applying simple nitrate salts to possibly break down the natural organic matter in the sediment. That would cause an increase in sediment porosity that would allow dissolved oxygen in seawater to penetrate to the oiled zone and create oxygen-rich conditions that might stimulate more rapid biodegradation.

Comments

Thu, Sep 30, 2010 Gilbert Van Deventer Midland TX

I'll add this food for thought as well. Introducing commercial products readily available, such as ORC (Oxygen Release Compound), HRC (Hydrocarbon Reducing Compound), and RegenOx from Regenesis and manufacturers with similar products, provide a slow and controlled release of oxygen and other nutrients in safe levels to enhance the biodegradation of hydrocarbons. As Mr. Jamesson correctly states, H2O2 is more expensive, particularly because it would have to be re-introduced periodically over time in dilute concentrations. H2O2 releases oxygen immediately and too high a concentration of it at one application could be harmful to the aquatic biota. Products like ORC and HRC and others require less frequent applications because of the slow and controlled release performance of the product.

Thu, Sep 30, 2010 Gil Van Deventer Midland TX

A slow "controlled release" of oxygen can be applied by the use of commercial products like ORC ( Oxygen Release Compound) from Regenesis and other providers of permanganate compounds. Oxygen works best versus other nutrients to degrade hydrocarbons but it has to be introduced in limited concentrations that last over an extended period of time. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) has more of an immediate effect and will breakdown to H2O quickly so it would require multiple applications over time which is not cost effective..

Thu, Sep 30, 2010 Gil Van Deventer Midland TX

Good point Jean! EPA should leave the advice to folks like us! The same approach - addition of nutrients - is often applied onshore to speed up biodegradation of hydrocarbons in soil & groundwater but it's the direct introduction of oxygen that is the most beneficial. Nothing new there. Not sure about your H2O2 idea but in dilute concentrations it certainly is one way to introduce oxygen into the seawater without upsetting the natural chemistry balance in that environment. Too much concentrated H2O2 could be harmful to aquatic biota so it would have to be diluted somewhat.

Thu, Sep 30, 2010 Guy Jamesson Columbus OH, USA

The addition of both nitrogen and phosphorus supply nutrients for the biodegradation. Yes, there would be concern that too much should not be added, or not added in such a way that excessive N or P 'leaks' into the ocean. Oxygen is not a nutrient, but rather provides the driver for bio-oxidation. Adding hydrogen peroxide would be an alternative to promote chemical oxidation (instead of bio-oxidation), but would likely be more expensive than enhancing availability of oxygen from the air.

Thu, Sep 30, 2010 jean palmateer MA, USA

Adding Nitrogen to coastal areas will increase nitrogen in the ocean, and similar to rivers and streams this could add "too many nutrients". Would it work to add hydrogen peroxide, which breaks down to water and would not impact water chemistry as much as nitrate salts. Jean

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above