Dallas Law Firm Cautions Spill Workers about Benzene Exposure

While Gulf of Mexico coast fishermen and others have lost their livelihoods due to the spill, some who have been hired to clean up the oil washing up on beaches and marshes risk toxic exposure.

"Workers helping with the cleanup will likely be exposed to benzene through crude oil,” said Allen Vaught, an attorney with Dallas law firm Baron & Budd, P.C. “Benzene exposure can cause certain cancers like leukemia and lymphoma, and children are especially susceptible. Cleanup workers need to be monitored or warned about the hazards of benzene exposure. The latency period of benzene can be anywhere from 2 to 50 years. That's a serious health impact that can last for half a century.”

Vaught has experience dealing with benzene exposure cases due to his work as an environmental attorney for the past decade.

Benzene is a known byproduct of crude oil, both on land and underwater. The biggest concern in this case is the food supply and the workers directly exposed to crude. Fish are highly susceptible to benzene due to bioaccumulation ─ it permeates their tissue in the water. Crude oil has been known to irritate skin, eyes and lungs and inhaling crude oil vapors can cause other health problems such as headaches, dizziness, vomiting, diarrhea, wheezing and asthma.

Volunteers who helped clean up the Exxon Valdez oil spill 20 years ago are now feeling the long-term effects of exposure to oil. What some medical experts originally diagnosed as a case of the flu turned out to be more serious.

"This is very different than in the Exxon Valdez case when the crude was more centralized, which made the exposure easier to control,” Vaught said. “Instead, we're dealing with multiple plumes spread over a larger area that could take years to clean up.”

Comments

Wed, Sep 15, 2010 John SW US

I wonder if any of these workers received any OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 training which educates the works of the hazards, potential exposure scenerios, etc? As a hazardous waste site a health and safety plan should have been in place and all worked should have had the opportunity to review it and understand ALL hazards associated with working on the cleanup. The article on references benzene but there are many other hazardous chemicals associated with that cleanup.

Tue, Sep 14, 2010 wade hughes houston, TX

Info? I was a worker on the spill. Animal Response Team "HEADS ON WITH THE OIL" N I HAVE PICTURES "SAFETY LADY NEVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT WHAT U TALKING ABOUT. N NO HAZ-MAT PAY. WHAT SHOULD I DO.

Wed, Jun 23, 2010 Thom Hayes US-East Coast

In my opinion, Ball is a despicable opportunist. His comment is appropriate, correct and ethical right up to the point that he mentions the name of a testing tool company.

Fri, Jun 18, 2010 Dr Lathan Ball United Kingdom

Those involved with the oil spill clean-up and those living and working close to the affected shoreline will be exposed to benzene. With airborne monitoring it is not possible to say exactly how much benzene an individual has been exposed to. Biomonitoring, the measurment of a chemical or a breakdown product from that chemical in the body of an individual allows a much more accurate measurment of a persons exposure to that harmful chemical. For example the measurement of a specific urinary metabolite of benzene called S-PMA allows a persons exposure to benzene to be determined. Biomark Limited have recently launched a simple to use and cost-effective benzene biomonitoing test. This test allows large numbers of sample to be taken and quickly measured. Details of this test can be found at www.biomark.co *** The test is available on-line to individuals, environmental organisations, companies and governments.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above