Share this Page


Duke Climate Scientist: Storms, Scandals Don't Discount Global Warming

 

William Chameides 

William L. Chameides, dean of the Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University.

One of the snowiest U.S. winters in recent history coupled with last year’s leak of damaging e-mails from a group of climate scientists has led some to question whether global warming is nothing but hot air.

Not true, says a Duke University climate scientist. “There is a reason we call it global warming,” said William L. Chameides, dean of Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment and a member of the National Academy of Sciences. “Global temperatures can be warming even if temperatures in the United States are not.”

While the United States has been experiencing wintry extremes, other regions of the world have contended with extreme heat waves, he said, including Australia, Brazil, and South Africa.

The United States winter has been exceptional for its snow but not its cold, he noted. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climate Data Center reported that January 2010 was the fourth-warmest January on record. Average temperatures in the contiguous United States that month were about a half a degree Fahrenheit above the long-term averages.

“This pattern of warmer temperatures and stronger storms is consistent with climate models that show global warming will bring more extreme weather, specifically more severe storms with greater amounts of precipitation,” Chameides said.

The leaked e-mails, in which scientists from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit wrote about using a “trick” to “hide the decline,” have given climate science a black eye, Chameides acknowledged. “The worst thing we climate scientists can do at this point is contend that these issues are inconsequential. They aren’t,” he said. “Transparency and impartiality are at the heart of the scientific process.

“But it's egregious for climate deniers to exaggerate the problem. A careful, objective, complete reading of the scientific literature reveals the scientific evidence that the globe is warming – and that this warming is connected to human activities – remains strong.”

About the commentator: Chameides has combined more than 30 years in academia as a professor, researcher, teacher, and mentor with a three-year stint in the nongovernmental organization world as the chief scientist of the Environmental Defense Fund. In November 2008, he was appointed the vice chair of the Committee on America’s Climate Choices, commissioned by Congress to develop a multi-decadal roadmap for America’s response to climate change. He joined Duke as dean of the Nicholas School in 2007.



Comments

Fri, Mar 5, 2010 Jeff Utah

Hey Gary, you better get your calculator out! There is a new report that a chunk of the Artic seabed is releasing methane to a tune of 7.7 million tons. Did you account for this in your naturally occuring calculation? You do know that methane oxidizes in deep water, which becomes CO2 before reaching the surface. What shall we do about this source? Oh I forgot you said that the science is "incontrovertible" we should just concentrate on the man-made sources and continue to bankrupt private industry. "Good and overwhelming science" my foot!

Thu, Mar 4, 2010 usa

i checked noaa and it shows normal temps in Oklahoma for jan. I am 30 and it was the coldest january I can ever remember, by far. The temp data gathering is the same they used 150 yrs ago. Obviously it is outdated.

Wed, Mar 3, 2010 Larry AZ

It's clear that Duke gets alot of funding and grants for global warming studies. So it makes no difference to them if the planet is warming or not, as long as they get their funding. distorting or fabricating data means nothing to them in the effort to get funding.

Tue, Mar 2, 2010 Jeff Utah

I guess actual emails from the scientist doing the study admitting to data flaws is not good for you. Good for you Gary, you in California continue to wage war on the private sector and continue to watch the decline of your state. Fact, no warming since 1995. You keep standing up and shouting under the platform of deciet and lies. Science has taken a hit because of the the Global Warming clowns - Al Gore. What a joke.

Tue, Mar 2, 2010 Holly in Illinois Champaign, Illinois

I believe global warming deniers need to realize that we all have a responsibility to be good stewards of our resources. That means you don't pollute the air knowing it will have an adverse effect on other people. Freedom comes with responsibilities. You have not proven that the data collection is fraudulent, only that one scientist was not willing to disclose the sources of some of the data. Thus you bad mouth all of the scientists.

Tue, Mar 2, 2010 Gary CA

Jeff from Utah is a perfect example of the damage done by mis-truths spread by big energy and the ultra-conservative, paranoid right. People like Jeff are reading garbage issued by contrarians, and placing ultimate confidence in it. Isolated examples by a minute number of people are over-riden by credible science from researchers with no profit or personal motivation. Can Jeff say that about his sources of his "scientific" facts? The climate change community is very much in order. The science is incontrovertible. Unfortunately, the garbage put out by energy, oil and coal companies is sneaky enough to sucker in those who don't look into the validity of the claims. I read a lot of comments in response to articles on climate change, and invariably the list is 90% against the article. Its time that those of us who recognize good and overwhelming science when we see it begin to speak out against the delay for profit crowd!

Mon, Mar 1, 2010 Jeff Utah

“But it's egregious for climate deniers to exaggerate the problem. A careful, objective, complete reading of the scientific literature reveals the scientific evidence that the globe is warming – and that this warming is connected to human activities – remains strong.” So us climate deniers should just keep silent even when the data procurement is proven to be fraudulent. I don't think, scientist that advocate global warming better get their own house in order, before throwing stones.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above