Environmental Protection Blog

Blog archive

2012 Temperatures Rank 10th Highest in History

On Jan. 15, 2013, NCDC announced as part of its 2012 Global Climate Report that 2012 was the warmest La Niña year on record. While there are a variety of approaches for defining a La Niña or El Niño year, NCDC's criteria is defined as when the first three months of a calendar year meet the La Niña or El Niño threshold as defined by NOAA Climate Prediction Center's (CPC) Oceanic Niño Index (ONI).

Some of the highlights of the report include 2012 was the 10th warmest year since the beginning of temperature records in 1880. 2012 marked the 36th consecutive year with global temperatures reaching about the 20th century average. The global annual temperature has increased at an average rate of 0.11°F per decade since 1880 and 0.28°F per decade since 1970.

Highlights for the U.S. include that 2012 was the warmest year since national records began in 1895. In Austria, the first half of 2012 was cooler than average, but then the last half of the year was warmer than average. Norway had its 45th warmest year since 1900.

So, how do you feel about these reports? The fact that 2012 experience such warm conditions shows that rising temperatures may soon be the norm each year. Do you feel that we could help battle global warming, or do you think that global warming is inevitable despite any actions we may take to help reduce or prevent it?

Posted by Lindsay Page on Feb 07, 2013 at 12:43 PM


Comments

Tue, Mar 26, 2013

The Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old. Do you honestly think that any of this is relevant? Let's not forget the emails leaked from various universities that exposed these climate change types for what they are. Real, ethical scientists do not manipulate data to fit their hypotheses. Hey Slick, what is your solution to high population numbers. Whatever it is, I bet it will not include you. If we do not have these so called greenhouse gases we would be Mars.

Tue, Mar 19, 2013

We do not know all the factors involved with climate; but that does not stop the politicians and vested interested groups from "ther solutions". The bulk of airborne particulates are natural;EPA wants to reduced the amount of fine particles even though the bulk are natural and just happen to be seed for precipitation. Whenb reducing airborne "contaminants" makes financial sense, the problem will solve itself. There are many greenhouse contaminants, carbon dioxide is just one. If the volcanoes stoped belching, and people stopped enhaling, maybe then some significant control would be measured.

Tue, Mar 12, 2013 SC, USA

Inevitable and not so fast that most of the world can adapt.

Tue, Mar 12, 2013 Slick Ohio

I believe the temperatures are directly proportional to the population of the Industrialized Nations. The more people, the more heat generated from manufacturing plants, homes, cars, power plants, etc. to support them. The planet can only sustain a fixed amount. Once that is reached, we will all be in trouble !

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above