Environmental Protection Blog

Blog archive

EPA Exposes Major Sources of Climate Pollution with Online Tool

For the first time, the biggest producers of carbon pollution are now exposed thanks to the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) online tracking system. It’s no surprise power plants release a wealth of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that threaten the environment. Now, EPA has the data to support those emission suspicions available to the public, identifying the biggest contributors to carbon pollution.

The online tool received GHG data from more than 6,700 entities reporting data from the 2010 calendar year – some did post data as recent as 2011. The 2010 GHG data includes public information from facilities in nine industry groups that directly emit large quantities of GHGs, as well as suppliers of certain fossil fuels.

What the online tool discovered was that power plants were responsible for emission of 2,324 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (mmtCO2e) – a major contributor to climate change. Petroleum refineries followed with emissions of 183 mmtCO2e.

CO2 accounted for the largest share of direct GHG emissions with 95 percent, followed by methane with 4 percent, and nitrous oxide and fluorinated gases accounting for the remaining 1 percent. Within the reported data, 100 facilities each reported emissions over 7 mmtCO2e, including 96 power plants, two iron and steel mills and two refineries.

As of early November 2011, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) reported preliminary climate change associated disaster costs exceeded $45 billion – lest we include the remaining two months to the total. The National Resources Defense Council addressed major health costs associated with continued climate change in March 2011:

  • Extreme Storms Affect Health and Infrastructure
  • Heat Waves Increase Death and Illness
  • Air Pollution Contributes to More Smog and Respiratory Illness
  • Pollen Allergies Proliferate
  • Mosquito- and Tick-Borne Infectious Diseases Spread More Widely
  • Drinking Water Becomes Increasingly Contaminated
  • Water and Food Supplies Threatened
  • Large Numbers of Environmental Refugees

The myriad of global health costs can continue if this tracking system now in effect doesn’t impact some change. If the severity of climate change worsens, it can affect not only natural resources, but families and communities.
It’s been a long time coming.

EPA launched the GHG Reporting Program in October 2009, requiring the reporting of GHG data from large emission sources across a range of industry sectors, as well as suppliers of products that would emit GHGs if released or combusted.

 “Thanks to strong collaboration and feedback from industry, states and other organizations, today we have a transparent, powerful data resource available to the public,” said Gina McCarthy, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation. “The GHG Reporting Program data provides a critical tool for businesses and other innovators to find cost- and fuel-saving efficiencies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and foster technologies to protect public health and the environment.”

This information can be used by communities to identify nearby sources of GHGs, help businesses compare and track emissions, and provide information to state and local governments.

Access the EPA’s new reporting tool and view the results from the 2010 data collected here.

 

Posted by Christina Miralla on Jan 11, 2012 at 11:55 AM


Comments

Thu, Jan 19, 2012 KD Cleveland

Are you guys commenting on the on-line tool or just railing against possible human influence in climate change? Can it really be that most qualified climate scientists in the US and the rest of the world are conspiring in an elaborte climate change hoax. To what end? What wealth will be redistributed? In the end, we'll all pay for increased cost of power directly and indirectly.

Tue, Jan 17, 2012

Another example of a government agency that is totally out of control. They are judge, jury, and executioner against the electric utilites when no evidence has ever been presented that climate change/global warming exists. Another example of wealth redistributon being promoted by the liberals.

Tue, Jan 17, 2012 Earnest Harper Boise, ID

No one can prove beyond even a little doubt that CO2 causes GW so now the EPA is refining detection to regulate a NON-POLLUTANT and in some cases Scientists (?) are shifting focus to elements (e.g. Methane) that are fractions of a fraction of CO2 by volume. A recent article on this even stated a clear falsehood if not an outright lie or presented gross ignorance that CO2 is the "Chief" greenhouse gas which is patently false. Water Vapor is the dominant GHG representing 95% by volume of all greenhouse gases, CO2 is 1% (only 3% of that is anthropogenic), Methane is about 0.00017% and Nitrous Oxide is 0.00003%! In small little chambers scientists can legitimately say that methane is a more effective warming agent but they continue to ignore the effects of SCALE and historic evidence of past episodes of warming and ice ages where at best CO2 was shown to LAG temperature which preceded eventual rises in CO2. THE EPA really needs to re-adopt some science and avoid political means as its substitute if they want to reclaim some respect out here.

Tue, Jan 17, 2012

Interesting opinion piece singling out man made climate change, but as usual offering no hard science or data to back up the claim.

Thu, Jan 12, 2012 Bruce Allen Pennsylvania

I am all for reducing GHG emissions, to change current climate change happenings. For instance just moved back to Northeastern Pennsylvania. From ten years in the Caribbean., and who would have thought tropical storms, got here for Irene then Lee homeowners has skyrocketed deductables are through the roof, no-pun intended. I do however have an issue with whats being done. America is always been a problem solver but it's China and India that still worry me. Were they not at Copenhagen also in 2008? Didn't they make same promises? They are not following their plan in reduction of GHG.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above