Environmental Protection Blog

Blog archive

Uncivil Disobedience

Your mother always said not to buy what you can’t afford – and the case of Tim DeChristopher explains why.

In 2008, when George W. Bush’s administration sought to auction off several drilling leases before Barack Obama took office, DeChristopher bid on a series of oil leases on 22,000 acres near Arches and Canyonlands national parks in Utah valued at $1.7 million. The catch is, he never intended to pay for them. He said he bid up the auctions to prevent oil companies from ruining the environment in the area, which hosts some of Utah’s most awe-inspiring wonders. DeChristopher terms it civil disobedience. The Justice Department, however, calls it fraud.

One federal prosecutor calculated that DeChristopher’s actions drove up the price of the leases by $300,000, causing one bidder to lose more than $600,000 and depriving the Bureau of Land Management, which owned the drilling rights, of more than $900,000. Incidentally, the auctions were later declared invalid and all sales nullified – meaning none of the parties actually lost any money.

For the act, DeChristopher was sentenced to two years in prison, a $10,000 fine and three years of probation, much to the chagrin of environmental activists. The environmentalist’s supporters argue that the justice department should have dropped the charges or gone easy on DeChristopher because his actions didn’t actually harm BLM or oil investors. They allege that the government pursued such a strong sentence only because it was acting on behalf of oil company interests, protecting big oil corporations’ profits over the people’s desire to save the environment.

The judge, however, pointed out that DeChristopher’s actions were illegal, no matter what the context. “I'm not saying there isn't a place for civil disobedience. But it can't be the order of the day.” Federal prosecutors also argued that a harsh sentence would deter others who might want to follow in DeChristopher’s auction-fixing footsteps.

Is this a case of little guy versus corporate behemoth? Or is this more like an arrogant kid thumbing his nose at the man, the law and anyone who stands to benefit from their rule? Those supporting DeChristopher have already come out with comparisons to Rosa Parks, Ghandi and other protest leaders who used civil disobedience to draw attention to monumental wrongs governments were perpetrating.

I think that goes too far. Rosa Parks dared to sit at the front of the bus, something she should have had the right to do. Other civil rights leaders sat in at counters they should have had the right to sit at. Ghandi sold salt he should have been allowed to traffic. Regardless of what you think about the morality of drilling in Utah, there’s no way to argue that buying something without intending to pay for it – ie, breaking a contract – is a fair principle the American justice system is failing to uphold.

Indeed, civil disobedience does not merely require that one break any law to make a point; it requires that one break an unjust law. The federal provision governing auction fraud is, unfortunately for DeChristopher, not an unjust one.

So while DeChristopher’s supporters celebrate him as a hero, they might want to take a look back at the lives of the people they’re comparing him to. They might not see much of a resemblance.

Posted by Laura Williams on Jul 28, 2011 at 12:43 PM


Comments

Fri, Jul 29, 2011

Nate's comment reveals a fundamental misunderstanding about these auctions. The land is not up for bid, only the resources it contains, and the right to build infrastructure required to develop them are for sale. Title to the land is not transferred. As to the "toll" that drilling in Utah would have on the environment, this is a bogus arguement, again based on a complete misunderstanding of the impact of resource production.

Thu, Jul 28, 2011 NYCActivist

Your article is factually wrong in at least two respects: (1) After winning the land, DeChristopher did indeed hold an online fundraiser and was equipped and ready to pay the downpayment ($100,000). He was not allowed to because (2) Environmental groups and others cannot, by federal land lease laws, bid on land for "non-consumptive" reasons, i.e. to not deforest/drill it. (see http://www.perc.org/articles/article1235.php )

Thu, Jul 28, 2011

Who ran the auction? Didn't they do some due diligence on the potential bidders?

Thu, Jul 28, 2011 Jessica Davis-Stein Los Angeles

The auction was illegal! it was a last ditch sell off/giveaway from GW Bush admin. an attempt to steal land from the American people .That's why what DeChristopher did was so brave. Most of the parcels were not sold and remain protected.

Thu, Jul 28, 2011 Nate Chicago

Laura, I must respectfully disagree that the law he broke is not unjust, specifically in this circumstance. The government was auctioning off PUBLIC lands at prices well below their actual value. In other words, the government was allowing Big Oil to steal from the public, from the American People. If that's not unjust, I beg you to tell me what is. How can what he did be considered "auction fraud" when the entire auction was null and void in the first place?

Thu, Jul 28, 2011 Matthew

I think, with DeChristopher, his actions were simply more complicated than civil disobedience, and that was necessary because of the nature of what he was protesting; I doubt that he was less moral than Gandhi or Rosa Parks. It comes down to the lesser of two evils, and the damage of fraud is certainly less than the toll that the drilling in Utah would have on the environment.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above