Did You Know Paper Money Contains A Potentially Toxic Substance?

The cash register receipts that people place near paper money in billfolds, purses and pockets has led to a worldwide contamination of paper money with bisphenol A (BPA) — a potentially toxic substance found in some plastics, thermal paper and other products. The amounts of BPA on dollars, Euros, rubles, yuans and other currencies, are higher than in house dust, but human intake from currency is at least 10 times less than those from house dust. That's the conclusion of a new study in the ACS' journal Environmental Science & Technology.

Kurunthachalam Kannan and Chunyang Liao point out that manufacturers use BPA to make polycarbonate plastics used in some consumer products, including water bottles, sports equipment and household electronics. Studies indicate that BPA acts as an endocrine disruptor — meaning it mimics the action of the sex hormone estrogen. Exposure to BPA has been linked to a variety of health problems. Although a recent study found traces of BPA in U.S. currency, nobody knew until now about BPA in paper money worldwide.

The scientists' analysis of 156 pieces of paper money from 21 countries found that all contained traces of BPA. The report notes, however, that "estimated daily intake from paper currencies were 10-fold lower than those reported from exposures due to [indoor] dust ingestion in the United States." The highest BPA levels were in paper money from Brazil, the Czech Republic and Australia, while the lowest occurred in paper money from the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. Levels in U.S. notes were about average.

Kannan and Liao also found that the most likely source of the BPA in the currency is the thermal paper used in cash register receipts. They showed that receipts can transfer BPA onto cash when placed next to it or when a receipt is touched before handling currency. "Although high levels of BPA were measured in paper currencies, human exposure through dermal [skin] absorption appears to be minor," the article notes.

The sources of human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) are not well characterized. Little is known about the presence of BPA in paper products, especially in paper currencies, and its implications for human exposure. In this study, paper currencies from 21 countries (N = 156) were analyzed for BPA, which was measured in 19 mm punches taken from three spots on the paper currencies. BPA was found in all paper currencies at concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 82.7 μg/g (mean 4.94; median 1.02) and the concentrations in samples taken from the middle portion of the currencies were higher than those taken from peripheral portions. The researchers also examined the transfer of BPA from thermal receipt paper to currencies by placing currencies in contact with thermal receipt papers for 24 h in a wallet. Concentrations of BPA dramatically increased after 24 h of contact with thermal receipt papers, suggesting that thermal receipt paper is an important source of BPA in paper currencies. The estimated daily intake of BPA through dermal absorption from handling paper currencies was on the order of a few nanograms per day.

Provided by American Chemical Society

Comments

Wed, Aug 24, 2011 Bill Suncook NH

To all those who are concerned you can send all your paper money to me and I will dispose of it properly.

Tue, Aug 23, 2011 Sue NY

Mark, I'd love to see the studies you site, and who funded them. Here is the Wikipedia site for BPA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisphenol_A#Health_effects A study published in Scientific American: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=bpa-study-plastic-chemica A study done by the EWG: http://www.ewg.org/reports/bisphenola An article from The New York Times about a study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2010/09/20/20greenwire-study-human-exposure-to-bpa-grossly-underestima-4581.html?pagewanted=all "All scientists agree that BPA resembles estrogen, and indeed, it was first synthesized as a man-made estrogen substitute before being used widely in the linings of canned goods and polycarbonate plastics"

Tue, Aug 23, 2011 Michigan Mark Michigan, U.S.A.

Hello Isaiah: You should do absolutely nothing different than what you already do! Wash your hands. Lots of scientific studies have been published showing there is no harm to people by the use of BPA containing plastics. These studies have been performed in several different countries. However, many places have laws against the use of BPA plastics in products used by children due to public outrage to their government, not due to any scientific study. As a child, I was always told to wash my hands after handling money since so many hands touch it. There is nothing else you need to do.

Mon, Aug 22, 2011 Isaiah Nigeria

I wanna ask the reseachers what we should do in cases like this

Wed, Aug 17, 2011 Sue NY

When you add up the dose from this AND the multiple exposures from other sources day after day after day and you begin to see problems. Studies have proven that babies are being born pre-polluted with BPA and many other chemicals. Ever wonder why food allergies and disorders like autism are becoming more and more common these days? It's due to the toxic soup of chemicals we expose ourselves to everyday. Check out www.cosmeticsdatabase.com and find out what you're being exposed to. This IS an epidemic. People need to get educated and laws need to be passed to protect ourselves.

Tue, Aug 16, 2011 Loren Kelly Surprise, AZ

Meh. There are so many other things to worry about out there.

Tue, Aug 16, 2011 Tony Portland, OR

Can you imagine the mass panic when cashiers around the world go on strike? They handle currency AND thermal receipt paper. I wonder who is really funding these ridiculous studies? And WHY?

Tue, Aug 16, 2011 Ernie Harper Boise

Let me know when this is a problem. In the meantime you're wasting ink. Media really should a Safety professional on staff.

Tue, Aug 16, 2011 Eric Omaha

Send me your money if you are worried about it being contaminated. :)

Tue, Aug 16, 2011 Dennis Hoaglin Iowa, USA

This source of BPA is defninitely NOT TOXIC based on the "dose" one would normally receive from handling paper money. The media is quick to ignore the fact that a toxic substance must enter the body, must be of a sufficient concentration and must be of sufficient duration and frequency of exposure in order to be "toxic". "The dose makes the poison". Media should stop trying to scare people with misleading articles like this one. If there is an epidemiological study finding BPH toxicity among bank tellers out there, I'd be interested in seeing it. Until then, report the facts in a way that reflects the truth. People are paranoid enough already.

Add your Comment

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above